2014
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2014/3479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Clinical Manifestation, Plain Film Radiography and Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Maxillofacial Trauma

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:Maxillofacial injuries are one of commonest injuries encountered. Roentgenographic evaluation of maxillofacial trauma is of prime importance for diagnosis and treatment of these injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Forty patients were evaluated in prospective four year study. We studied and evaluated the demography and diagnostic efficacy of clinical, plain radiography, and computed scan in maxillofacial trauma. RESULT: Road traffic accidents were commonest cause of maxillofacial injuries. Patients having multipl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imaging of the maxillofacial region can be challenging in trauma patients and conventional radiographs are becoming less popular as a result of the availability of computer tomography. 40,41 The specialists who reviewed the radiographs agreed that most of these radiographs were inappropriate for the diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures. This suggests that either maxillofacial fractures were incidental findings or that the attending clinician had requested inappropriate radiographic projections for the diagnosis of these fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging of the maxillofacial region can be challenging in trauma patients and conventional radiographs are becoming less popular as a result of the availability of computer tomography. 40,41 The specialists who reviewed the radiographs agreed that most of these radiographs were inappropriate for the diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures. This suggests that either maxillofacial fractures were incidental findings or that the attending clinician had requested inappropriate radiographic projections for the diagnosis of these fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%