2020
DOI: 10.22266/ijies2020.0229.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Active Disturbance Rejection Control with RST Control for Variable Wind Speed Turbine Based on Doubly Fed Induction Generator Connected to the Grid

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a new control strategy called linear active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) used to control the wind energy conversion system (WECS) based on doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG). This recent control strategy is compared with the conventional RST polynomial control method considered better and more efficient than the classical PI method according to different works. By the extended state observer ESO of the ADRC controller, the internal and the external disturbances on the syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aerodynamic model of the wind turbine is modeled mathematically by the following equation [9,24]:…”
Section: Wind Turbine Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aerodynamic model of the wind turbine is modeled mathematically by the following equation [9,24]:…”
Section: Wind Turbine Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that the ADRC control strategy is characterized by very good robustness and that it has a good efficiency in set points tracking because it has many advantages, such as good performance and high accuracy in case of dynamic system control, system stability ensured and the easy implementation thanks to the tuning parameters reduced [8]. The ADRC method typically uses an Extended Status Observer (ESO) which acts as a status feedback controller and provides the system status information in real time and it allows estimating and deleting all internal and external disturbance can affect the system [8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a robust command based on the extension of the system model by a supplemental and fictitious state variable representing all the user cannot control in the mathematical model of the system controlled [17]. All real disturbances and modeling uncertainties are represented in this virtual state, the estimation of which is ensured by an extended state observer (ESO) [18][19][20][21]. Using this estimated state, a control signal is generated to decouple the system from the actual disturbance acting process.…”
Section: Active Disturbance Rejection Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, its capacity to provide variable speed operation means that energy can always be extracted even at low wind speeds and that DFIG rotates at the optimal rotational speed for each wind speed, which minimizes mechanical stress, improves energy quality, and compensates for torque and power pulsations. Finally, the rotor-side converter (RSC) can be controlled to place the turbine system at an operating point where energy extraction is maximal through a technique called 'Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT)' [4][5][6][7]. There are several approaches to the transformation of DFIG in the literature to successfully achieve control of the wind system, we find like Stator Voltage Orientation (SVO) [8] and Stator Flux Orientation (SFO) [9], in many cases, these approaches have been successfully combined with linear and non-linear controls like proportionalintegral controller (PIC) [10,11],Classic Sliding Mode Controller (CSMC) [11] and Adaptadtive Backstepping controller(ABC) [12] with High Gain Observer (HGO) [13] to control the DFIG effectively but under stable network conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%