2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2019.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT angiography in the detection of large vessel vasculitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a report evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for large-vessel vasculitis using three criteria (visualization of circumferential thickening of the aortic wall, contrast enhancement in the aortic wall, and inflammatory changes in the periaortic tissue), the diagnostic accuracy was reported to have 60.9% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity. 10 In our patient, a contrast-enhanced CT was performed after the diagnosis was confirmed, and only slight circumferential wall thickening of the aorta was observed with contrast enhancement ( Supplemental Figure S1 ). Therefore, primary care physicians should be cautious about ruling out TA on CT if vasculitis is suspected, especially in the early stages of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In a report evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for large-vessel vasculitis using three criteria (visualization of circumferential thickening of the aortic wall, contrast enhancement in the aortic wall, and inflammatory changes in the periaortic tissue), the diagnostic accuracy was reported to have 60.9% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity. 10 In our patient, a contrast-enhanced CT was performed after the diagnosis was confirmed, and only slight circumferential wall thickening of the aorta was observed with contrast enhancement ( Supplemental Figure S1 ). Therefore, primary care physicians should be cautious about ruling out TA on CT if vasculitis is suspected, especially in the early stages of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…02 (a-c, d-f) using these two methods for quantitative assessment of the inflammatory region, it was found that PETVAS was superior to SUVmax in describing the overall inflammatory load parameters [70]. The second semiquantitative method calculates the ratio of SUVmax between arteries and the liver [74,76]. It had a sensitivity of 79.3% and a specificity of 100.0%, respectively, when the cut-off value equal to 1.27 [74].…”
Section: Assess Disease Activitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A small case-control study showed that CTA was able to resolve superficial temporal artery abnormalities such as perivascular contrast enhancement and blurring of vessel walls ( 79 ). Several studies ( 80 , 81 ) suggest that PET/CT provides superior sensitivity over CTA alone. This is reflected in the EULAR guidelines, which do not routinely recommend that the diagnosis of GCA or evaluation of LVV hinge on CTA ( 82 ).…”
Section: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%