Great Ape Societies 1996
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511752414.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative socio–ecology of Pan paniscus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among bonobos (Pan paniscus), too, mitochondrial DNA diversity within communities is high among females, consistent with behavioral observations of female dispersal (Idani, 1991;White, 1996). For example, Gerloff et al (1999) found five different mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in a set of 15 females in the Eyengo community in Lomoko Forest in the Democratic Republic of Congo.…”
Section: Studies Of Dispersal Patternssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Among bonobos (Pan paniscus), too, mitochondrial DNA diversity within communities is high among females, consistent with behavioral observations of female dispersal (Idani, 1991;White, 1996). For example, Gerloff et al (1999) found five different mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in a set of 15 females in the Eyengo community in Lomoko Forest in the Democratic Republic of Congo.…”
Section: Studies Of Dispersal Patternssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Among great apes, the two closely related species of Pan, the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus) have long been viewed as behaviorally quite different, with bonobos living in cohesive female-bonded social groupings and chimpanzees forming generally less cohesive and smaller male-bonded groups (e.g., Kano, 1992;Nishida and Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, 1987;Wrangham, 1986). Recent studies, however, suggest that intraspecific variability caused by living under different ecological conditions is far greater than initially thought and that the apparent differences between the two species reflect the specific ecological conditions more than the species-specific characteristics (e.g., Boesch, 1996;Boesch et al, 2002;White, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little is known about the possible behavioural adaptations to predation pressure in bonobos [Hohmann and Fruth, 2002]. Predators are more common at Lomako, Democratic Republic of Congo, than at Wamba, Democratic Republic of Congo [White, 1996]. Interestingly, party sizes are smaller, lone parties are less common and mixed parties are more common at Lomako than at Wamba [Boesch, 1991;White, 1996].…”
Section: Behavioural Adaptations Of Great Apes To Potential Predationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predators are more common at Lomako, Democratic Republic of Congo, than at Wamba, Democratic Republic of Congo [White, 1996]. Interestingly, party sizes are smaller, lone parties are less common and mixed parties are more common at Lomako than at Wamba [Boesch, 1991;White, 1996]. While researchers have attributed these intersite differences to a variety of factors [Hohmann and Fruth, 2002], the potential effects of predation risk may have been overlooked.…”
Section: Behavioural Adaptations Of Great Apes To Potential Predationmentioning
confidence: 99%