1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2885.1998.00120.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative pharmacokinetics of sulfamethazine in plasma and parotid saliva of sheep

Abstract: Salivary output in sheep is large enough to be considered a physiologic body fluid compartment. The hypothesis for this work was that pharmacokinetics of sulfamethazine in saliva was similar to that in plasma. A reliable technique was developed to measure parotid salivary output. Mean output of saliva was 3.18 +/- 1.04 L from a single parotid gland per day with a mean flow of 2.21 +/- 0.43 mL/min. Using concentrations of sulfamethazine in parotid saliva made it possible to calculate the total passage of sulfam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is similar to those reported by Srivastava et al. (1989) (76.2 μ g/mL after 18 h in cross‐breed bovines) and Pulido et al. (1998) (58–65 μ g/mL after 12 h in sheep).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Parameters After Intravenous Administrationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This result is similar to those reported by Srivastava et al. (1989) (76.2 μ g/mL after 18 h in cross‐breed bovines) and Pulido et al. (1998) (58–65 μ g/mL after 12 h in sheep).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Parameters After Intravenous Administrationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Sulfamethazine is classified as a long-acting sulphonamide (Spoo and Riviere 2001), but in our work, sulfamethazine plasma concentrations remains above 50 μg/mL for 21.38± 2.21 h; 21.20±3.3 h; 15.63±2.16; 14.45±3.23 h in one, three, seven and fifteen-week-old calves, respectively; therefore, sulfamethazine behaved as an intermediate-acting sulphonamide in all age groups. Our results are similar to those reported by Srivastava et al (1989), Pulido et al (1998) and Baroni et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Forestomachs are little developed and relatively non-functional in newborn ruminants. Non-ionized drugs and those with good lipid solubility, pass in either direction across rumen epithelium by a passive diffusion mechanism (Atef et al 1981;Pulido et al 1998). Nouws et al (1989) administered sulfamethazine in ruminants of two different ages (twelve and eighteen weeks-old) and they observed a longer persistence of sulphadimidine at eighteen weeks-old compared to the twelve weeks-old calves (a lower total body clearance and a prolonged elimination of this drug were found in the older animals).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%