“…The lower the score, the greater the relatively inefficiency DEA has been used extensively in this country as well as in the Commonwealth of Australia and the United Kingdom to make relative efficiency comparisons between multiple service providers in such service areas as: health care, schools, the courts, police systems and higher education (Cruise & Nyhan, 2000;Nyhan & Martin, 1999a;Stough & Dinc, 1997;Thanassoulis, Boussofiane & Dyson, 1995;Callen, 1991;Fare, Grosskope & Weber, 1989;Lewin, Morey & Cook, 1982). Some limited application of DEA has also been made in the human services (Nyhan & Martin, 1999b;Byrnes, Freeman & Kauffman, 1997;Ozcan & Cotter, 1994). The Commonwealth of Australia and the United Kingdom, both of which have a longer history of using and analyzing performance measurement data than does the United States, have also both recommended that DEA be used as a primary tool in assessing the relative efficiency of government programs including human service programs (Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision, 1997; Public Sector Productivity Panel, n.d.).…”