2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Classifiers in Detection of Childhood Pneumonia Using Chest Radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All features tested are based on texture and extracted in nine subspaces of Haar wavelet, like our previous paper [7]. We performed a 10-fold cross-validation test with each classifier.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All features tested are based on texture and extracted in nine subspaces of Haar wavelet, like our previous paper [7]. We performed a 10-fold cross-validation test with each classifier.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we use the features and dataset employed in previous studies [1] [6] [7], which have resulted in a full CAD system for pneumonia detection called PneumoCAD, which has been applied to assist in diagnostics, as well as to train and improve radiologists' expertise in childhood pneumonia detection using chest radiographs. PneumoCAD is currently in prototype stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods were able to achieve considerable results and had a comparatively low misclassification rate of~20% with kNN, and 10% with kNN and Haar Wavelet, despite the area-under-curve (AUC) value being comparatively less for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Later on, a comparative analysis of the algorithm had been conducted using Pneumo-CAD with Sequential Forward Elimination (SFE), Pneumo-CAD without SFE, and Support Vector Machine (which used SFE) gave accuracies of 66%, 70%, and 77% [19], respectively. This research also tested the Naïve Bayes algorithm and got an accuracy of 68% with it.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sousa [22] diagnoses childhood pneumonia by combining features dimension reduction using SFS, PCA and KPCA and classification algorithms. The best results have been achieved for KPCA: SVM 89%, kNN 93%, Naive Bayes 96%.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%