2018
DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2018.1532471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Performance Analysis of AVR Controllers Using Modern Optimization Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since fluctuations in the terminal voltage adversely affect the system, the terminal voltage must be kept constant at a specific level. The PID controllers are usually used for this [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. But when the PI controller is selected, one less zero is added to the system than the PID controller.…”
Section: Modelling Avr Systems With a Pi Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since fluctuations in the terminal voltage adversely affect the system, the terminal voltage must be kept constant at a specific level. The PID controllers are usually used for this [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. But when the PI controller is selected, one less zero is added to the system than the PID controller.…”
Section: Modelling Avr Systems With a Pi Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first PSO based heuristic method proposing to determine the AV R system controller gains was introduced by Gaing [12]. After this study, many heuristic methods have been used in this subject [15,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the previous table, KA, KE, KG, and KS stand for gains of an amplifier, exciter, generator, and sensor, respectively, while TA, TE, TG, and TS are time constants of the amplifier, exciter, generator, and sensor. Values that are considered in this paper are KA = 10, KE = 1, KG = 1, KS = 1, TA = 0.1, TE = 0.4, TG = 1, and TS = 0.01 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. It is important to mention that the gain of the generator KG depends on the load of the generator.…”
Section: Component Transfer Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it can be found that the authors used Chaotic Ant Swarm (CAS) [7], Multi-Objective Extremal Optimization (MOEO) [9], Cuckoo Search (CS) [10], and Salp Swarm Optimization (SSO) algorithm [12] to determine unknown parameters of the FOPID. Besides the FOPID, many existing studies deal with the optimization of the parameters of the classical PID controller for the AVR systems [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%