2021
DOI: 10.1002/2050-7038.12930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium optimizer tuned novel FOPID‐DN controller for automatic voltage regulator system

Abstract: Summary This paper presents a novel fractional‐order PID plus derivative with filter coefficient (FOPID‐DN) controller for automatic voltage regulator (AVR) system using the MATLAB/Simulink environment. An AVR system is employed in the power system to maintain the terminal voltage at the desired level. Parameters of the proposed FOPID‐DN controller are optimally tuned by the recently developed Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) algorithm. Performance of the designed FOPID‐DN controller for an AVR system is compared wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To derive the constraints that can ensure the stability of the generated family of plants from the perturbed polynomial 'P', we substitute λ = jω in Equation ( 16) and assume η = ω 2 then the perturbed polynomial 'P' can be defined in Equation (17),…”
Section: Robust Mpc Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To derive the constraints that can ensure the stability of the generated family of plants from the perturbed polynomial 'P', we substitute λ = jω in Equation ( 16) and assume η = ω 2 then the perturbed polynomial 'P' can be defined in Equation (17),…”
Section: Robust Mpc Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15,16], Jaya optimization algorithm (JOA) and gradient-based optimization (GBO) algorithm are introduced for the tuning of a fractional-order PID controller for AVR. In addition, a fractional-order PID including derivative with filter factor is adjusted based on equilibrium optimizer (EO) for AVR in [17]. In [18,19], a fractional PID controller for an AVR system is designed using particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is the case for the DC motor, a controller is also required for efficient operation of an AVR system. In that respect, several controller structures such as PID controller (Bingul and Karahan, 2018; Zhou et al, 2019), FOPID controller (Bhookya and Jatoth, 2019; Bhullar et al, 2020b), PID plus second order derivative (PIDD 2 ) controller (Mokeddem and Mirjalili, 2020; Mosaad et al, 2018) and derivatives of PID controller (Moschos and Parisses, in press; Paliwal et al, 2021) along with neural network predictive control (Elsisi, 2019) and state feedback controller (Eke et al, 2021; Gozde, 2020; Mary et al, 2021) have so far been utilized. Similar to the case in DC motors, the PID controller is the most preferred controller for an AVR system, as well (Ayas, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driven by the need for maintaining the terminal voltage stability in power systems, different adaptive control approaches [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], such as neural network methods [11] and optimization approaches [12] of AVRs, are being explored for terminal voltage stability purposes. An efficient, robust, and adaptive AVR control is necessary due to uncertainty, nonlinearity, and high-level penetration of distributed energy resources in modern power grids.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e drawback of the work is that the proposed method is only tested under changes in some AVR system parameters and did not reflect the robustness of the AVR control system under fault or disturbance conditions or from the instability point of view. Papers [17,18] make use of the fractionalorder PID in addition to the second-order derivative controller (FOPIDD) to achieve a better transient response at a terminal voltage of AVR. In [17], the parameters of the controller are tuned optimally by the Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) algorithm, whereas [18] utilizes a multiverse optimizer (MVO) algorithm to tune the parameters of the controller.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%