Comparative Morphology of the Papillae Linguales and their Connective Tissue Cores in the Tongue of the Greater Japanese Shrew‐mole, Urotrichus talpoides
Abstract:The external morphology of the papillae linguales (papillae filiformes, papillae fungiformes and papillae vallatae) and their connective tissue cores (CTCs) of the greater Japanese shrew-mole (Urotrichus talpoides) were analysed by optical and scanning electron microscopy. Papillae filiformes were distributed over the dorsal surface of the apex linguae, and on the rostral and caudal regions of the corpus linguae but were less numerous in the mid-region. They were absent from the radix linguae. A pair of oval p… Show more
“…The filiform papillae structure in other mammals such as giant panda was multifilamentous with meaningful secondary papillae (Pastor et al., ), different than alpaca. In contrast to our research, the appearance of filiform papillae in Japanese shrew mole varied depending of the area (Yoshimura et al., ). The shapes of filiform papillae were various between lingual areas, where in rostral part, the filiform papillae had one main sharp projection, in the middle region had two sharp projections, while in caudal section had three sharp projections (Yoshimura et al., ), which is different than in alpaca.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to our research, the appearance of filiform papillae in Japanese shrew mole varied depending of the area (Yoshimura et al., ). The shapes of filiform papillae were various between lingual areas, where in rostral part, the filiform papillae had one main sharp projection, in the middle region had two sharp projections, while in caudal section had three sharp projections (Yoshimura et al., ), which is different than in alpaca. Histologically, the structure of filiform papillae in alpaca resembles these papillae in other animals, especially Bactrian camel (Eerdunchaolu et al., ).…”
The aim of this study was the description of the lingual and buccal papillae in adult alpaca (Vicugna pacos) by light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The tongue consisted of apex, body and root. Four types of lingual papillae (filiform, fungiform, conical and circumvallate) in addition to two types of buccal papillae were observed. The filiform papillae, some with secondary papillae, were distributed on both the corpus and apex of the tongue, with stratified epithelium, and layer of keratin coat were recognized. The short (small) cone papillae had pointed top, while bunoform papillae were wide with smooth apex. The much less numerous circumvallate papillae with pseudopapillae on the each rim of the caudal lingual body were present with weak layer of keratin and intra-epithelial taste buds. The small fungiform papillae were found on the dorsal lingual surface, while the large fungiform papillae were situated on the ventral surface of the tongue, especially, in rostral part and were round in shape with numerous gustatory pores and very thin keratin coat. Pseudopapillae were present on the buccal conical 'bunoform' papillae surface, while 'elongate' buccal papillae surface was rather softly folded with thin coat of keratin. Microridges were observed in the less keratinized parts of each type of papillae. The orientation of either lingual or buccal papillae into the throat side facilitates the emptying of oral cavity from nutrient and swallowing of food. In conclusion, the anatomical features of the alpaca tongue are an adaptation to the feeding habits.
“…The filiform papillae structure in other mammals such as giant panda was multifilamentous with meaningful secondary papillae (Pastor et al., ), different than alpaca. In contrast to our research, the appearance of filiform papillae in Japanese shrew mole varied depending of the area (Yoshimura et al., ). The shapes of filiform papillae were various between lingual areas, where in rostral part, the filiform papillae had one main sharp projection, in the middle region had two sharp projections, while in caudal section had three sharp projections (Yoshimura et al., ), which is different than in alpaca.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to our research, the appearance of filiform papillae in Japanese shrew mole varied depending of the area (Yoshimura et al., ). The shapes of filiform papillae were various between lingual areas, where in rostral part, the filiform papillae had one main sharp projection, in the middle region had two sharp projections, while in caudal section had three sharp projections (Yoshimura et al., ), which is different than in alpaca. Histologically, the structure of filiform papillae in alpaca resembles these papillae in other animals, especially Bactrian camel (Eerdunchaolu et al., ).…”
The aim of this study was the description of the lingual and buccal papillae in adult alpaca (Vicugna pacos) by light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The tongue consisted of apex, body and root. Four types of lingual papillae (filiform, fungiform, conical and circumvallate) in addition to two types of buccal papillae were observed. The filiform papillae, some with secondary papillae, were distributed on both the corpus and apex of the tongue, with stratified epithelium, and layer of keratin coat were recognized. The short (small) cone papillae had pointed top, while bunoform papillae were wide with smooth apex. The much less numerous circumvallate papillae with pseudopapillae on the each rim of the caudal lingual body were present with weak layer of keratin and intra-epithelial taste buds. The small fungiform papillae were found on the dorsal lingual surface, while the large fungiform papillae were situated on the ventral surface of the tongue, especially, in rostral part and were round in shape with numerous gustatory pores and very thin keratin coat. Pseudopapillae were present on the buccal conical 'bunoform' papillae surface, while 'elongate' buccal papillae surface was rather softly folded with thin coat of keratin. Microridges were observed in the less keratinized parts of each type of papillae. The orientation of either lingual or buccal papillae into the throat side facilitates the emptying of oral cavity from nutrient and swallowing of food. In conclusion, the anatomical features of the alpaca tongue are an adaptation to the feeding habits.
“…Moreover, primary and secondary types of these papillae were mentioned in the same study (Can, Atalgın, Ates, & Takçı, 2016). In the some previous studies on mice (Toprak, 2006) and blind mice (Yoshimura, Shindo, & Kageyama, 2013), it is indicated that papillae filiformes are located in three different places of the tongue and their shapes are observed in three different types. The papillae in intermolar region of mice formed homocentric circles (Toprak, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the previous studies, it is reported that dorsal faces of all papillae vallatae are flat (Ates, Akaydin Bozkurt, Kozlu, Alan, & Düzler, 2013;Can et al, 2016;Erdogan et al, 2016;Erdogan & Perez, 2014;Jackowiak & Godynicki, 2004;Yoshimura et al, 2013;Zheng & Kobayashi, 2006). However, circular extensions were determined on the tongues of wolves that were varying between 10 and 14 in number.…”
In this study, it was aimed to perform light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigation of the tongue and papilla belonging to two wolves. Light microscopy and SEM images of tongues were taken. It was observed that papillae filiformes concentrated in apex of these investigated tongues. In addition to, these papillae were observed in the whole tongues. It was also determined that papillae fungiformes were distributed rarely in between papillae filiformes. Papillae foliatae were placed in the lateral side of tongues. There were two papillae vallatae in the median part of tongues. Papillae vallatae was determined in radix linguae. It was observed that papillae vallatae formed circular extensions in many different dimensions and a hole was present in a circular structure in the center. Papillae conicae were seen on dorsal surface of radix linguae. Papillae foliatae were seen four laminal structure and placed on the each lateral side of tongues. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that presents of light microscopy and SEM findings related with the tongues of wolves.
“…Studies that assessed the structure of the tongue in chosen mammals living in different habitats and receiving different diets have found there are species-specific morphological differences (Iwasaki and Miyata 1990 ; Chamorro et al 1993a , b ; Saber et al 2001 ; Jackowiak 2006 ; Toprak and Yilmaz 2007 ; Elsnasharty et al 2013 ; Yoshimura et al 2008 , 2013 ; Erdoğan et al 2015 , 2016 ; Goździewska-Harłajczuk et al 2015 , 2016 ; Akbari et al 2017 ).…”
The aim of this study was to characterise the tongue in wild-type rats using several microscopic techniques. Warsaw Wild Captive Pisula Stryjek (WWCPS) rats belong to a lineage of wild-caught rats. The study was carried out on tongues of 15 male and 15 female WWCPS rats. Histological, histochemical and ultrastructural studies were carried out. There were no significant differences between the male and female WWCPS rat tongues. There was a median groove approximately 1 cm long in the apex of the tongue that faded caudally. The intermolar prominence was clearly marked in the distal part of the lingual body. Lingual mechanical papillae located on the surface of the tongue formed four subtypes based on their shape: small filiform papillae, giant filiform papillae, thin elongated filiform papillae and wide filiform papillae. Gustatory papillae formed the second group of papillae and were divided into bud-shaped fungiform papillae, a single vallate papilla surrounded by an incomplete papillary groove and foliate papillae, which were a well-formed and composed of several pairs of folds divided by longitudinal grooves. In the posterior lingual glands (mucoserous and serous), acidic sulphated mucin-secreting cells gave a strong AB pH 2.5 positive reaction, and a positive reaction with the AB pH 1.0 stain for acidic carboxylated mucin. Double AB/PAS staining showed the presence of the majority of mucous cells with predominant of acidic mucins. Positive PAS staining showed the presence of neutral mucin. HDI staining demonstrated a weak positive reaction within Weber’s glands of the WWCPS rat tongue.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.