2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11686-021-00360-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative molecular prevalence and subtypes distribution of Blastocystis sp. a potentially zoonotic infection isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blastocystis sp. is an intestinal parasite whose pathogenic role is underestimated; several studies reported its presence in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients [26,27]. In Syria, epidemiological and molecular studies on this parasite are scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blastocystis sp. is an intestinal parasite whose pathogenic role is underestimated; several studies reported its presence in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients [26,27]. In Syria, epidemiological and molecular studies on this parasite are scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blastocystis hominis was the most common detected parasite followed by Entamoeba coli, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium, Iodamoeba butchlii, and Endolimax nana. Blastocystis is considered a common protozoan infection in humans in Iran [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Results of a recent systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that Entamoeba coli, Blastocystis spp., and Giardia lamblia are the most prevalent protozoan parasite among intellectually disabled individuals in Iran [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis was done using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) v3 software, with p-values <0.05 as statistically significant [ 17 , 18 ]. Cochrane's Q and I 2 statistics (with a significance level of 50%) were employed to evaluate the potential heterogeneity in studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%