2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00159.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative in vitro antibacterial activity of six root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis and Proteus vulgaris

Abstract: With the exception of Roth 601, which retained its antimicrobial activity, the AH-Plus, TopSeal, and AH-26 sealers all demonstrated antimicrobial properties against Enterococcus feacalis and Proteus vulgaris that diminished when set. TopSeal significantly affected Enterococcus feacalis when compared with AH-Plus. GuttaFlow and EndoREZ expressed no antimicrobial activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous investigations pointed out that the original formulation of GuttaFlow does not present antimicrobial activity, 9,10 and thus the silver nanoparticles were solely responsible for promoting a preservative effect. 16 Silver particles present antimicrobial potential, which is manifested by anchorage to or penetration into the bacterial cell wall, and modulation of cellular signaling by dephosphorylating putative key peptide substrates on tyrosine residues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous investigations pointed out that the original formulation of GuttaFlow does not present antimicrobial activity, 9,10 and thus the silver nanoparticles were solely responsible for promoting a preservative effect. 16 Silver particles present antimicrobial potential, which is manifested by anchorage to or penetration into the bacterial cell wall, and modulation of cellular signaling by dephosphorylating putative key peptide substrates on tyrosine residues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…faecalis, and Proteus vulgaris. 10 On the other hand, the incorporation of low concentrations of insoluble antibacterial nanoparticles in the GuttaFlow original formulation exhibited significant and stable antimicrobial properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they had a weak antibacterial effect similar to that of calcium-hydroxide-based sealers. 2628 To date, the development of a root canal sealer with long-term antibacterial activity and good biocompatibility remains a challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los resultados de los estudios de Wainsteim, descritos anteriormente, mostraron halos de inhibición provocados por AH Plus mayores al encontrado por el sellador Topseal, debido a que en dichos estudios se crearon pozos en la superfi cie del agar, de esta manera se obtuvo un contacto directo de los selladores y el microorganismo, mientras que en la presente investigación los selladores estaban contenidos en discos de papel cartulina que se pusieron en contacto con el agar sobre el cual se sembró el Enterococcus faecalis. Farmakis et al, en el año de 2012, demostraron la efi cacia antibacteriana de Topseal el mismo que provocó un halo de inhibición de 11 mm, Farmakis usó el método de difusión de agar por 24 horas a 37°C, para ello creó en la superfi cie del agar un pozo con el fi n de tener contacto directo entre el material de estudio y el medio de cultivo, usando una pipeta para un volumen de 0,3 ml, los selladores recién mezclados fueron introducidos en el pozo mediante una jeringa de insulina (15). Esta investigación encontró un halo nol posee efecto antimicrobiano, el eugenol tiene un efecto bactericida, acción que se ha atribuido a los fenoles por degeneración de las bacterias, hongos y formas vegetativas (10).…”
Section: Efi Cacia Antibacteriana De Tres Selladores Endodónticos Freunclassified