Handbook of Research on Comparative Human Resource Management 2012
DOI: 10.4337/9780857938718.00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Human Resource Management: An Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it fits into the ongoing discussion about universalist versus contextualist views in HRM (Brewster 1999b). While the former emphasizes universal underlying principles and looks for common best practice in HRM, the latter focuses on contextual specifics and searches for good fit between various practices and the respective situation (Brewster and Mayrhofer 2011). Within the contextual view, there is an extensive literature on the role of the cultural (Reiche, Lee and Quintanilla 2012) and institutional (Wood, Psychogios, Szamosi and Collings 2012) context for HRM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…First, it fits into the ongoing discussion about universalist versus contextualist views in HRM (Brewster 1999b). While the former emphasizes universal underlying principles and looks for common best practice in HRM, the latter focuses on contextual specifics and searches for good fit between various practices and the respective situation (Brewster and Mayrhofer 2011). Within the contextual view, there is an extensive literature on the role of the cultural (Reiche, Lee and Quintanilla 2012) and institutional (Wood, Psychogios, Szamosi and Collings 2012) context for HRM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The convergence-divergence debate was extended to the field of HRM by several leading scholars (see, e.g., Brewster, 2004;Dowling et al, 2013;Tregaskis & Brewster, 2006;Brewster & Mayrhofer, 2012;Brewster et al, 2015;Sparrow & Budhwar, 1997;Sparrow & Hiltrop, 1997;Sparrow et al, 1999). These and other scholars of comparative international HRM initiated work on the convergence-divergence theses to help us better understand the dynamics of international HRM (see, also, von Glinow et al, 2002);Mcgaughey and De Cieri, 1999;Katz and Darbishire, 2000;Rowley and Benson, 2000;2002;Liu et al, 2004;Pudelko et al, 2006;Witt, 2008;Paik et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Convergence-divergence Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An emerging body of recent literature on international HRM takes an opposing view (see Brewster and Mayrhofer, 2012). It has been argued that formal private property rights may have very limited impact on the actual regulation of labor, reflecting the fact that many countries do not have homogenous legal systems and variations in enforcement capabilities (see Cooney et al, 2011;Wood & Brewster, 2007).…”
Section: Employee Rights Fdi and Hr Practice: Current International mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this would challenge the assumption of the property rights orientated literature that labor regulation is detrimental to owners/shareholders: it is possible for both workers and owners to benefit from specific regulatory regimes through the adoption of higher value added HR policies. Again, it can be argued that MNCs may adjust policies to cope with, compensate for, and gain complementarities from, different regulatory and institutional regimes (Brewster & Mayrhofer, 2012). Khavul et al (2010) argue that internationalization by firms from emerging markets may provide an opportunity to learn about and adopt new HR practices.…”
Section: Employee Rights Fdi and Hr Practice: Current International mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation