2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus mucosae LM1 identifies potential niche-specific genes and pathways for gastrointestinal adaptation

Abstract: Lactobacillus mucosae is currently of interest as putative probiotics due to their metabolic capabilities and ability to colonize host mucosal niches. L. mucosae LM1 has been studied in its functions in cell adhesion and pathogen inhibition, etc. It demonstrated unique abilities to use energy from carbohydrate and non-carbohydrate sources. Due to these functions, we report the first complete genome sequence of an L. mucosae strain, L. mucosae LM1. Analysis of the pan-genome in comparison with closely-related L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(109 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the current study followed their method to identify L. mucosae with certain credibility. The ANI value of L. mucosae was between 0.955 and 0.999, which was consistent with a previous result [6]. Compared with other Lactobacilli, the ANI value span of L. mucosae was relatively large, indicating that the proportion of variable genes was large, and the diversity was rich.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the current study followed their method to identify L. mucosae with certain credibility. The ANI value of L. mucosae was between 0.955 and 0.999, which was consistent with a previous result [6]. Compared with other Lactobacilli, the ANI value span of L. mucosae was relatively large, indicating that the proportion of variable genes was large, and the diversity was rich.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…ANI analysis was carried out to evaluate the relationship among the species with a threshold greater than 95% being the same species. The method of calculating ANI was based on the average of the identity of the homologous genes of each pair of sequences [6]. The protein sequences extracted from those 101 strains were aligned using Orthomcl software (maintaining 50% identity; the cut-point parameter E-value was 1e-4) [17].…”
Section: The Average Nucleotide Identity (Ani) Values and Phylogenetimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The whole genome of strain YL-11 was annotated via Rapid Annotation Subsystem Technology (RAST). Identification of coding proteins was predicted by using databases of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and the Cluster of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG) databases (Valeriano et al, 2019). The EPS genes were aligned using the NCBI database.…”
Section: Genome Gene Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%