2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of the resolution of hydronephrosis in children who underwent open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…O'Brien et al [8] compared the outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasties, and detected lower rates of hospital stay, and complications in the RALP group, while longer operative times were detected in the groups of RALP, and laparoscopic surgery. In another study by Barbosa et al [9] comparable success rates were reported for RALP, and open surgery groups, while longer operative times were indicated for the RALP group. In a series of 66 cases Bansal et al [10] reported ileus in 2, port site infection in 2, urine leakage in 1, and stent migration in 1 patient In our series 6 patients were successfully treated without any complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…O'Brien et al [8] compared the outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasties, and detected lower rates of hospital stay, and complications in the RALP group, while longer operative times were detected in the groups of RALP, and laparoscopic surgery. In another study by Barbosa et al [9] comparable success rates were reported for RALP, and open surgery groups, while longer operative times were indicated for the RALP group. In a series of 66 cases Bansal et al [10] reported ileus in 2, port site infection in 2, urine leakage in 1, and stent migration in 1 patient In our series 6 patients were successfully treated without any complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…[8,10,11] However, the age of patients who undergo minimally invasive pyeloplasty can be even lower. It has been reported that LP is the standard treatment for UPJ obstruction in children from 3 years of age [20], and even from 4 months of age [21] in some institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] To date, some reports including meta-analysis have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive pyeloplasty compared to OP in the pediatric population. [9][10][11][12] However, there have been few studies, especially in Asian countries, directly comparing OP, LP, and RALP surgical techniques. In our present study, we describe the clinical characteristics and compare the surgical outcomes of OP, LEXP, and RALP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] More recent meta-analyses and reports have indicated that robotic pyeloplasty is the same as open with consideration to postoperative urinary leaks, hospital readmission rate, and operative time,[10] and robotic pyeloplasty may result in higher overall rates of resolution of hydronephrosis. [11] With 2 year's follow-up, only 5% of patients who underwent robotic pyeloplasty require a secondary procedure, when compared with 13% who underwent a pure laparoscopic pyeloplasty. [12] Other technique papers have indicated that redopyeloplasty is a feasible procedure,[13] and robotic ureterocalycostomy can be considered when a redo pyeloplasty is not possible.…”
Section: Procedural Applications and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%