2014
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2014203.533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FIVE METHODS FOR EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF OCCLUSAL CARIES LESIONS – in vitro study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study has shown that NIRT lesion detection is closest to clinical results in occlusal carious lesions and superior to other detection methods like dyes, laser fluorescence, and X-rays. Thus, NIRT would be the most useful method as an adjunct to visual inspection [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A previous study has shown that NIRT lesion detection is closest to clinical results in occlusal carious lesions and superior to other detection methods like dyes, laser fluorescence, and X-rays. Thus, NIRT would be the most useful method as an adjunct to visual inspection [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from this study show a low agreement between BW and visual examination which further confirms previous studies reporting that early occlusal carious lesions cannot be detected by BW. A limited number of studies compared NIRT with the visual method on the occlusal surface [25,26]. One study showed a very high correlation between clinical examination and NIRT with a kappa value of 0.99 [25], while the other study found that NIRT also correlated the most with visual examination with r = 0.51 [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The caries tissues appear as dark spots. According to a recent study, the results obtained by DIAGNOcam were better correlating with the clinical results when compared with DIAGNOdent (23).…”
Section: Diagnodentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In places other than the correct structure, the laser beam is refracted and scattered, which distinguishes carious lesions from the healthy tissue. The image is captured by the camera, and then sent to a computer where the software allows for archiving images, as well as subsequent graphic processing [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In the images obtained with the DIAGNOcam camera, anatomical tooth edges are clearly visible and the dentineenamel junction is very well visualized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%