2019
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2889519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Sea Ice Lead Detection Based on SAR Imagery and Altimeter Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining classes were deemed too complex for further interpretation and retracking. This method has been expanded to also work with waveforms from AltiKa and Sentinel-3 [40].…”
Section: Statistical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining classes were deemed too complex for further interpretation and retracking. This method has been expanded to also work with waveforms from AltiKa and Sentinel-3 [40].…”
Section: Statistical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, SAR and radar altimeter are able to provide finer resolutions, but their demands in terms of instruments (high power requirements and complex circuit designs) result in high costs. In addition, interpretations of SAR images are typically time-consuming and subjective [20] and the use of empirical retracking has no physical model for altimeter [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altimetric data alone is, however, not sufficient to unambiguously determine the origin of waveform changes over sea ice, because of temporal and spatial variability of waveforms and the impact of off-nadir specular reflectors [6,7,12]. Near-coincidental SAR imagery has proven a valuable source for verification of lead detection algorithms in altimeter data processing, e.g., [13,14]. In the late 1980s, two studies have been undertaken with data from Seasat and Geosat to relate SAR backscatter and altimetric data over sea ice, but both were limited to one SAR image as a reference [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%