Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of Neo MTA Plus with Biodentine and white ProRoot MTA

Türker, Sevinç Aktemur; Uzunoğlu, Emel; Bilgin, Burcu

doi:10.1080/01694243.2016.1219443

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This result was associated with the lower bond strength and biomineralization ability of MTA-based sealers compared with AH Plus (Madhuri et al 2016). NeoMTA Plus has been associated with greater and more prolonged calcium and hydroxyl ion release, so greater biomineralization compared with MTA Plus (Sagsen et al 2011, Siboni et al 2017) and high bond-strength values (Aktemur T€ urker et al 2017) might have contributed to its adhesion to the dentine walls. This may explain the similar removal efficacy of NeoMTA Plus and AH Plus in the present study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Micro‐CT evaluation of the removal of root fillings using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment system supplemented by the XP‐Endo Finisher file

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To compare the removal of root fillings in extracted teeth using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment system (PTUR) followed by a supplementary preparation with the XP‐Endo Finisher file. Methodology The mesiobuccal root canals of 30 extracted mandibular first molars were instrumented with ProTaper Universal NiTi files up to F2 and filled with one of the following sealers using a single‐cone technique (n = 10): AH Plus, NeoMTA Plus and EndoSequence BC. The root fillings were removed using the PTUR system with additional apical preparation using ProTaper F2 and F3 files. Then, an additional preparation with an XP‐Endo Finisher file was performed. The samples were scanned using micro‐CT before and after retreatment and again after the use of the XP‐Endo Finisher to assess the volume of remaining filling material. Data were analysed by Kruskal–Wallis and Friedman's two‐way analysis of variance tests with Bonferroni correction. Results No significant difference in the initial filling volume was observed amongst the groups (P > 0.05). The amount of filling materials in each group decreased significantly after retreatment with rotary files (P < 0.05). After initial retreatment, the volume of the remaining filling amongst the groups was similar (P > 0.05). Additional preparation with the XP‐Endo Finisher improved the removal of filling materials regardless of the sealer type (P < 0.05). Conclusions In the mesiobuccal root canals of extracted mandibular first molars, additional preparation using an XP‐Endo Finisher file, after using the PTUR system and F3 ProTaper instruments, enhanced the removal of filling materials from root canals.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…) and high bond‐strength values (Aktemur Türker et al . ) might have contributed to its adhesion to the dentine walls. This may explain the similar removal efficacy of NeoMTA Plus and AH Plus in the present study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Micro‐CT evaluation of the removal of root fillings using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment system supplemented by the XP‐Endo Finisher file

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 9 These results can be attributed to the mechanical and physical properties of the evaluated sealers. NeoMTA Plus presents small particles 16 and ability to penetrate into dentinal tubules. 17 In addition, the higher bond strength of NeoMTA Plus when compared with Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, France) and White ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Oklahoma, United States) and the higher resistance to dislodgment of AH Plus than MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil) and EndoSequence BC Sealer (Brasseler, Savannah, Georgia, United States) 16 18 may favor their interaction with the dentin surface for both sealers.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Additional Apical Preparation on Retreatment of Curved Root Canals Filled with Different Sealers

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study assessed the influence of additional apical preparation on material removal during retreatment of curved root canals filled with different sealers. Materials and Methods Twelve mesial roots of mandibular molars with two separate canals and curvature between 25 and 35 degrees were selected. The working length was established 1-mm short of the apical foramen, and all the root canals were prepared using ProDesign R (PDR) 25/0.06. After preparation, the root canals were divided in two groups (n = 12) and filled by continuous wave condensation technique with NeoMTA Plus or AH Plus. All the root canals were retreated using rotary ProDesign Logic RT 25/0.08, reciprocating PDR 25/0.06 and apical preparation with PDR 35/0.05. Additional apical preparation was performed with ProDesign Logic (PDL) 50/0.01. The samples were scanned using a Skycan 1176 micro–computed tomography (micro-CT), voxel size 8.74 µm, before and after the retreatment procedures. Percentages of remaining filling material were evaluated. Statistical Analysis The data were submitted to paired and unpaired t-tests (α = 0.05). Results Percentage of remaining filling material was similar between the root canals filled with NeoMTA Plus or AH Plus sealer after retreatment using PDR 35/0.05, and after additional apical preparation using PDL 50/0.01 (p > 0.05). However, PDL 50/0.01 significantly decreased the percentage of remaining filling material in the apical third after the additional apical preparation for both sealers (p < 0.05). Conclusion NeoMTA Plus or AH Plus did not influence the retreatment of curved root canals. ProDesign Logic 50/0.01 promoted greater filling material removal in the apical third.

show abstract

“…NeoMTA Plus, a novel calcium silicate-based material, was introduced as a rapidly setting root repair material that, due to the presence of gel within its liquid, has optimal consistency, is easily manipulated, and does not cause any coloration 21,22 . However, little information about NeoMTA Plus is available in the literature, and its hydration reaction is not yet fully understood.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hydration reaction analysis of calcium-silicatebased materials using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction method

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aim: The components of calcium silicate-based materials can be identified through X-Ray Diffraction Analysis. This study aimed to determine the hydration reactions and particle size of MTA Angelus, Biodentine, and NeoMTA Plus as calcium-silicate-based materials. Material and Methods: The powder and set cement samples using divergence and scatter slits of 1○ and a receiver slit of 0.10 mm. The scanning range was set at 5○ to 70○, and ongoing scans for the theta-2theta range was performed with a scan speed of 2○/minute (-1). The patterns obtained were analyzed using search-match software. The three most substantial peaks were used to identify hydration reactions and major crystalline structures. Also, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis was performed and the particle size of set materials were determined using an image analysis software. Results: According to X-Ray Diffraction Analysis, the main components were determined as tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate in the three calcium silicate-based materials. We determined that the main components of the materials were similar. We also identified the extensive presence of tricalcium aluminate in MTA Angelus, calcium carbonate in Biodentine, and calcium phosphate salts in NeoMTA Plus. Furthermore, the results of the present particle analysis show that the calcium-silicate-based materials' distribution of particle count and size varies. Biodentine has the widest, and MTA Angelus has the narrowest particle size distribution range. NeoMTA Plus has the largest number of fine, large-sized particles (p < 0.0001), while MTA Angelus and Biodentine have a more homogeneous and nonstatistically significant particle distribution range (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The present findings provide insight into variations in performance between different calcium-silicate-based materials.

show abstract

Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of Neo MTA Plus with Biodentine and white ProRoot MTA

Cited by 10 publications

References 23 publications

Micro‐CT evaluation of the removal of root fillings using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment system supplemented by the XP‐Endo Finisher file

Micro‐CT evaluation of the removal of root fillings using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment system supplemented by the XP‐Endo Finisher file

Effect of Additional Apical Preparation on Retreatment of Curved Root Canals Filled with Different Sealers

Hydration reaction analysis of calcium-silicatebased materials using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About