Comparative evaluation of mutagenic effects of two cone‐beam computed tomography in oral mucosa cells

Abstract

BackgroundThis pilot study aimed to evaluate the mutagenic effects in cells of the oral mucosa after exposure to two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).MethodsEighteen adults were submitted to the different CBCT (Carestream CS8100 3D and I‐CAT). The cells were collected immediately before the CBCT exposure and 10 days later, when the material was placed on a slide and stained using the Feulgen/Fast Green technique. Microscopic analysis counted micronuclei and other nuclear alterations, which are indicative of cytotoxicity such as pyknosis, karyolysis, karyorrhexis, and binucletion. 2000 cells were analyzed. The statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon Signed‐Rank test to compare the frequency of cellular alterations, and the Mann–Whitney U test to compare different CBCTs, both with a significance level of 5%.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the micronucleated cell count before and after the exposition to the ionizing radiation from I‐CAT (p = .298) and CS8100 3D (p = .203) A significate increase of pyknosis (p < .001), karyolysis (p < .001), karyorrhexis (p < .001), and binucletion (p < .001) were noted on I‐CAT CBCT. There was no statistically significant difference in cellular alterations in CS8100 3D CBCT.ConclusionDespite the increase in micronuclei after exposure, this study indicates that there is no evidence of genotoxicity. On the other hand, the I‐CAT CBCT produced cytotoxic effects.