Comparative Evaluation of MMPBSA and XSCORE To Compute Binding Free Energy in XIAP−Peptide Complexes

Abstract

Evaluation of binding free energy in receptor-ligand complexes is one of the most important challenges in theoretical drug design. Free energy is directly correlated to the thermodynamic affinity constant, and, as a first step in druglikeness, a lead compound must have this constant in the range of micro- to nanomolar activity. Many efforts have been made to calculate it by rigorous computational approaches, such as free energy perturbation or linear response approximation. However, these methods are still computationally expensive. We focus our work on XIAP, an antiapoptotic protein whose inhibition can lead to new drugs against cancer disease. We report here a comparative evaluation of two completely different methodologies to estimate binding free energy, MMPBSA (a force field based function) and XSCORE (an empirical scoring function), in seven XIAP-peptide complexes using a representative set of structures generated by previous molecular dynamics simulations. Both methods are able to predict the experimental binding free energy with acceptable errors, but if one needs to identify slight differences upon binding, MMPBSA performs better, although XSCORE is not a bad choice taking into account the low computational cost of this method.

Homology modeling of human Transketolase: Description of critical sites useful for drug design and study of the cofactor binding mode

“…As regards the driving force of binding, the results using PB and [59][60][61][62][63] that the PB methodology has certain limitations when dealing with charged ligands such as TPP, specifically, that it shows too high polar desolvation contributions (DPB CAL ), whereas this contribution is normalized for zwitterionic or neutral ligands. Thus, it seems more appropriate to describe TPP binding by means of the MMGBSA protocol.…”

Theoretical studies on the interactions of XIAP-BIR3 domain with bicyclic and tricyclic core monovalent Smac mimetics

“…For entropic contribution, it is computationally expensive, so we extracted 10 snapshots to estimate the entropy. The binding free energy calculated by MM PBSA method is described as the follows [40]:…”

Vitamin D discovery outpaces FDA decision making

“…During our molecular modeling of the actions of ARBs upon the nuclear receptors, (32) and our subsequent presentation to the FDA, (33) we were struck by the symmetry with which endogenous ligands exhibited very similar affinities across several members of the type 1 nuclear receptor family. (69,70) ). Similar high affinities were found with 25-D, which yielded K d values of 8.36, 8.17, 8.32 and 8.07, respectively.…”