2010
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of laboratory-scale silages using standard glass jar silages or vacuum-packed model silages

Abstract: ROMOS represents a reasonable alternative to glass jar silages and opens the possibility for further investigations, e.g. studying the impact of packing density as well as the quantitative and qualitative analysis of fermentation gases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(). Only pH values (4.6 in average) are elevated overall for high moisture silages, but they are consistent with data from other studies in these types of experiment (Cherney, Alessi, & Cherney, ; Daems et al., ; Hoedtke & Zeyner, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(). Only pH values (4.6 in average) are elevated overall for high moisture silages, but they are consistent with data from other studies in these types of experiment (Cherney, Alessi, & Cherney, ; Daems et al., ; Hoedtke & Zeyner, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This could be explained by the good level of silage preservation overall, achieved using the laboratory-scale system of silage proposed by Daems et al (2016). Only pH values (4.6 in average) are elevated overall for high F I G U R E 1 Ammonia proportion in silages according to mixture and additive treatments (NA: no additive; A: acid; CT: chestnut tannin; OT: oak tannin; Z: zeolite; M0: pure ryegrass; M25: 25% red clover and 75% ryegrass; M50: 50% red clover and 50% ryegrass; M75: 75% red clover and 25% ryegrass; M100: pure red clover) moisture silages, but they are consistent with data from other studies in these types of experiment (Cherney, Alessi, & Cherney, 2006;Daems et al, 2016;Hoedtke & Zeyner, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…All silages had higher dry matter recovery in the first time of the opening, decreasing thereafter. A avaliação da eficácia de uso de aditivos em silagens, geralmente é realizada em silos de escala laboratorial, por permitir uma estimativa confiável de forma rápida e de baixo custo (MICKAN et al, 2004;HOEDTKE & ZEYNER, 2011). Atualmente, o uso de silagens a vácuo ganhou destaque, sendo utilizado em vários estudos, tanto em escala laboratorial, como em escala de fazenda (MOSS et al, 2002;JOHNSON et al, 2005;WALKER & FORSTER JÚNIOR, 2008;HOEDTKE & ZEYNER, 2011 Após a mistura do ECG com os diferentes aditivos, as amostras foram ensiladas a vácuo (500g de forragem/silo) em sacos plásticos (Nylon-poli, 16 micras, com 25cm de largura x 35cm de comprimento), com o uso de uma embaladora a vácuo (Tecmaq TM-280) para retirada do ar e selagem dos silos experimentais, de forma a obter uma densidade média de 600kg/m 3 da massa ensilada.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Jobim et al (2007). Para o milho reidratado foram utilizados silos experimentais confeccionados em sacos de polietileno fechados a vácuo, com capacidade para dois litros, de acordo com a metodologia sugerida por Hoedtke & Zeyner (2011). Foram utilizados tipos diferentes de silo visto a facilidade laboratorial de uso dos silos tipo saco e por autores como Neumann et al (2007), não encontrarem diferenças para o pH de silagens de planta de milho entre o silo tipo trincheira e silos laboratoriais e o trabalho de Rodrigues et al (2002) no qual não obtiveram diferença entre o pH de silos do tipo balde e silos do tipo saco.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified