2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of geospatial scenario-based land change simulation models using landscape metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Landscape pattern metrics have been widely used to reveal the landscape structure and spatial processes, including indices at three spatial levels: patches, categories and landscape [62][63][64][65]. To explore the spatial patterns of diverse land-use types within the county, this study selected the mean patch fragmentation dimension (MPED) and aggregation index (AI) to measure the morphology and spatial agglomeration degree of diverse land-use types at the class level [66,67].…”
Section: Landscape Pattern Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landscape pattern metrics have been widely used to reveal the landscape structure and spatial processes, including indices at three spatial levels: patches, categories and landscape [62][63][64][65]. To explore the spatial patterns of diverse land-use types within the county, this study selected the mean patch fragmentation dimension (MPED) and aggregation index (AI) to measure the morphology and spatial agglomeration degree of diverse land-use types at the class level [66,67].…”
Section: Landscape Pattern Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root mean square error (RMSE) and mean relative error (MRE) are widely used to evaluate the accuracy of geospatial modeling [38], so these two indicators are used to evaluate the GWANN in this paper, as shown in Equations ( 15) and ( 16). The results of the two indicators are shown in Table 4, and the mean RMSE for the 11 years of GWANN in the whole study area is 0.0526, while the mean MRE is 0.1029.…”
Section: Accuracy Of Gwannmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human activities thus greatly influence the landscape pattern of the Dapoling watershed. The ED value has an increase of 0.135 at the watershed scale, indicating that the edge density and total length of the landscape patches are increasing, the boundary between the patches is growing, and the shape of the landscape patches is becoming more irregular [65].…”
Section: Analysis Of Landscape Pattern Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%