2019
DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.249228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers for treating vascular cognitive impairment: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Abstract: Objective: To assess and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers (donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine) on cognition, behavior, function, and global status in patients with vascular cognitive impairment. Data sources: The initial literature search was performed with PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Methodology Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) from inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, clinical benefits of memantine are highly variable and have been questioned in several meta-analytic reviews, particularly for cases classified as mild AD (Blanco-Silvente et al, 2018;Folch et al, 2018;McShane et al, 2019). A similar case is verified for patients diagnosed with vascular cognitive impairment (Farooq, Min, Goshgarian, & Gorelick, 2017;Jin & Liu, 2019). The contrast between retrospective meta-analyses of large cohorts of patients and the sporadic reports of clinical benefit of memantine may be a consequence of preclinical models that do not represent the majority of patients of rather complex maladies such as coexisting cerebrovascular and Alzheimer diseases (Yassi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clinical benefits of memantine are highly variable and have been questioned in several meta-analytic reviews, particularly for cases classified as mild AD (Blanco-Silvente et al, 2018;Folch et al, 2018;McShane et al, 2019). A similar case is verified for patients diagnosed with vascular cognitive impairment (Farooq, Min, Goshgarian, & Gorelick, 2017;Jin & Liu, 2019). The contrast between retrospective meta-analyses of large cohorts of patients and the sporadic reports of clinical benefit of memantine may be a consequence of preclinical models that do not represent the majority of patients of rather complex maladies such as coexisting cerebrovascular and Alzheimer diseases (Yassi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with donepezil (5 and 10 mg) or galantamine (16 and 24 mg) therapy showed improvement in cognitive tests, while rivastigmine had no substantial effect on cognition 25 . Examining a wider range of outcomes, the meta-analysis of Jin and Liu 26 found, that the effect of ChEis on cognitive functions was similar, but without improvement on ADL and BPSD domains. The clinical heterogeneity of VaD limits the general validity of outcome data, the effect of treatment on specific patients or subgroups might be different.…”
Section: Vascular Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Противодементные средства (ингибитор ацетилхолинэстераз, мемантин) эффективны при деменции альцгеймеровского типа, а также при сочетании СКН и БА [55,56]. На основании систематического анализа противодементные средства расцениваются как препараты выбора для улучшения когнитивных функций при СКН, при этом отмечается положительное влияние акатинола мемантина в отношении функционального состояния пациентов [57].…”
Section: о б з о р ы к р и т е р и и к н с о с у д и с т о г о п р о unclassified