2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effects of (S)-ketamine and racemic (R/S)-ketamine on psychopathology, state of consciousness and neurocognitive performance in healthy volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to positive and negative symptoms, intravenous administration of ( R,S )-ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) was reported to produce cognitive impairments in healthy control subjects [ 166 ]. A recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in young healthy subjects demonstrated that intravenous administration of esketamine (0.1 mg/kg/min for 5 min and 0.006 mg/kg/min for 60 min) and ( R,S )-ketamine (0.2 mg/kg/min for 5 min and 0.012 mg/kg/min for 60 min) produced significant psychopathological and neurocognitive impairment compared to the placebo [ 167 ]. Interestingly, esketamine, but not ( R,S )-ketamine, significantly increased the auditory alterations subscore of the five-dimensional questionnaire for the assessment of altered states of consciousness; this finding suggests that arketamine exerts a potential protective effect against esketamine-induced psychotomimetic effects [ 167 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to positive and negative symptoms, intravenous administration of ( R,S )-ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) was reported to produce cognitive impairments in healthy control subjects [ 166 ]. A recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in young healthy subjects demonstrated that intravenous administration of esketamine (0.1 mg/kg/min for 5 min and 0.006 mg/kg/min for 60 min) and ( R,S )-ketamine (0.2 mg/kg/min for 5 min and 0.012 mg/kg/min for 60 min) produced significant psychopathological and neurocognitive impairment compared to the placebo [ 167 ]. Interestingly, esketamine, but not ( R,S )-ketamine, significantly increased the auditory alterations subscore of the five-dimensional questionnaire for the assessment of altered states of consciousness; this finding suggests that arketamine exerts a potential protective effect against esketamine-induced psychotomimetic effects [ 167 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, six infusions of ( R,S )-ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) significantly ameliorated cognitive impairment, as measured by processing speed, in patients with treatment-resistant MDD or BD [ 168 170 ]. A recent systematic review revealed that ( R,S )-ketamine infusion showed significant improvements in cognitive impairment in patients with treatment-resistant MDD, although ( R,S )-ketamine did not worsen cognitive function in depressed patients [ 171 ], as had been observed in healthy controls [ 166 , 167 ]. Furthermore, it was suggested that the improvement in working memory may be predictive of the anti-suicidal-ideation response to ( R,S )-ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant MDD [ 172 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Leal et al (2020), in a pilot study in TRD patients observed that (R)ketamine (arketamine) might produce a fast (60 min) and sustained antidepressant effect (7 days). On the other hand, Passie et al (2021) in an interesting placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers (n = 10), found no significant difference between the neuropsychological and psychopathological effects of two equivalent doses of (R,S)-ketamine and (S)-ketamine. Therefore, on the basis of this consideration it is likely that the choice of the right ketamine's enantiomer for the treatment of TRD or other forms of depression will be further debated (Hashimoto, 2019).…”
Section: Esketamine: Clinical Use In Depressionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On this basis, we can speculate that the rapid response of ketamine in responsive patients suggests that it is capable of activating brain circuits that may be only temporarily deactivated, and that this type of response may not be observed when ketamine is taken by healthy volunteers; reversibly circuits that are activated in the latter may not be available in MDD or TRD individuals. Interestingly, different enantiomers of ketamine might produce different effects and these effects might interact when (R,S)ketamine is administered as reported by Passie et al (2021) who suggested that (S)-ketamine and (R,S)-ketamine differ somewhat regarding their psychopathological effects. This observation may be relevant when evaluating the effects of ketamine in patients with TRD.…”
Section: Subgenual Cingulate Regionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation