1992
DOI: 10.4141/cjps92-135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effects of grain lentil–wheat and monoculture wheat on crop production, N economy and N fertility in a Brown Chernozem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1993, 1995 and 1996, wheat yields were also higher in the first than in the second year of wheat after fallow in the F-W-W (N & P) rotation. For the same experiment, wheat grain yields in F-W (N & P) were generally higher than in ContW (N & P), from 1979 to 1990 (Campbell et al 1992). …”
Section: Grain Yields In Crop Rotation Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In 1993, 1995 and 1996, wheat yields were also higher in the first than in the second year of wheat after fallow in the F-W-W (N & P) rotation. For the same experiment, wheat grain yields in F-W (N & P) were generally higher than in ContW (N & P), from 1979 to 1990 (Campbell et al 1992). …”
Section: Grain Yields In Crop Rotation Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Since flax remains in that rotation study at Swift Current and since it did not appear promising economically, flax was omitted from the current study. After 12 yr of a crop rotation study at Swift Current, Campbell et al (1992) reported a mean yield for lentil of 720 kg ha -1 when grown in a continuous crop rotation alternating with wheat, making this rotation more profitable than any other rotation in the study. Further, rotational benefits to wheat were evident from conserved soil N and water during the lentil phase.…”
Section: Canadian Journal Of Plant Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer-term studies suggest that N-benefits to wheat may be realized only after multiple years of legumes in rotation (Campbell et al 1992;Zentner et al 2004;Walley et al 2007;Allen et al 2011). This delayed response may be a reality of cool, waterlimited conditions in the NGP leading to low annual legume biomass contributions, slow breakdown of residues, and subsequent slow release of available N (Janzen et al 1990;Bremer and van Kessel 1992;Beckie et al 1997), especially in no-till systems (Schoenau and Campbell 1996;Triplett and Dick 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%