2013
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Abstract: Medical and surgical treatments for open-angle glaucoma lower intraocular pressure and reduce the risk for optic nerve damage over the short to medium term. Which treatments best prevent visual disability and improve patient-reported outcomes is unclear.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
209
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
209
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, which treatments are the best to prevent visual disability and improve patient‐reported outcomes are not known (Boland et al. 2013). Some previous traditional meta‐analyses (Zhang et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, which treatments are the best to prevent visual disability and improve patient‐reported outcomes are not known (Boland et al. 2013). Some previous traditional meta‐analyses (Zhang et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important point is that glaucoma is a complex disease resulting from the confluence of various factors. [27][28][29][30][31][32]43,44 To fill the gap between glaucoma patients and animal disease models, 45 we are currently investigating GLAST gene abnormalities in glaucoma patients.…”
Section: -37mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, improving awareness of glaucoma in the general population is important to early diagnosis to ensure that individuals at risk undergo appropriate eye examinations. Although screening the general population for glaucoma might reduce incidences of late presentation (Ramesh et al, 2010), at present there is no single effective screening test, largely due to the wide variation in normal (Boland et al, 2013;Burr et al, 2007). Nevertheless, while population screening is not cost effective, the targeted screening of high-risk groups may be cost effective (e.g., those with African ancestry or family history of glaucoma).…”
Section: Combining Information From Structural and Functional Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%