Comparative Effectiveness of Multiple Laser Scanning and Conventional Techniques on Zirconia Shear Bond Strength

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the impact of different laser scanning with that of conventional methods on zirconia surface treatment through evaluation of shear bond strength (SBS) values. One hundred and thirty-two sintered zirconia cubic-samples were prepared and randomly divided into six study groups: milling control (without surface treatment); grinding; sandblasting; and three-times, four-times, and five-times laser scanning groups. The treatment process for the first three groups was performed before the zirconia coating, while the last three groups were treated after zirconia coating with veneer slurry through a spraying technique. In the current study, the surface roughness Ra, contact angle measurement, phase transformation, topography and interfaces, SBS in unaged and aged conditions, and fracture mode patterns of zirconia cores were investigated. The results were analyzed using laser confocal scanning microscopy, drop analyzer, X-ray diffractometry (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), universal testing machine and stereomicroscope. The results indicated that three-times laser scanned specimens presented higher Ra values than the other studied groups. The minimum contact angle value was detected in the mentioned group, while the control group presented the highest value. The XRD showed phase transformation from tetragonal to monoclinic t–m following grinding and sandblasting. However, the laser scanned specimens and the control group preserved the structural integrity of the zirconia core, presenting the tetragonal phase only. The highest SBS values were recorded in specimens treated with three-times laser scanning in the unaged and aged conditions. A mixed fracture was a common fracture pattern among the studied groups. The results confirmed that SBS could be optimized through three-times laser scanning and it provided better adhesion between zirconia and the veneer ceramic material. Multiple scanning processes of more than three times are not recommended for zirconia surface treatment.

Effect of enamel-surface modifications on shear bond strength using different adhesive materials

“…Results showed that 5.25% NaClO had an acceptable deproteinization effect. The removal of the proteins by chemical means had no major effect on the elastic modulus and hardness of the dental enamel [ 35 ], as well as the laser surface treatments on the SBS between zirconia and veneering ceramic [ 36 , 37 ]. In recent years, studies have been conducted on the application of CO 2 laser pretreatment of the enamel surface to prevent enamel demineralization owing to acid erosion.…”

Sintering of free-standing zirconia granules with different Y2O3concentration

“…The asreceived TZ-3Y-E powder shows mixture of monoclinic and tetragonal phases assembley according to XRD difraction peaks in Figure 4. The most XRD diffraction can be indexed using T phase data sheet (XRD PDF#82-1241), and diffraction peaks [11] from M phase [11] are also visible as per XRD PDF card (XRD PDF#86-1449). The mixtures phase of the as- received powder can possibly be attributed to the inhomogious distribution of Y in 3Y-TZP nano powders [5].…”

Study of Al–SiO2 Aesthetic Composite Coating on Orthodontic Metal Archwire

“…Silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ) is a common modification layer given its superior physicochemical stability and biocompatibility. Importantly, the oxide layer may obstruct ion movement and release, improving metal mechanical properties and stability [11].…”