Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2003
DOI: 10.1145/642611.642626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly

Abstract: Although there has been much speculation about the potential of Augmented Reality (AR), there are very few empirical studies about its effectiveness. This paper describes an experiment that tested the relative effectiveness of AR instructions in an assembly task. Task information was displayed in user's field of view and registered with the workspace as 3D objects to explicitly demonstrate the exact execution of a procedure step. Three instructional media were compared with the AR system: a printed manual, com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
178
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
178
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Reiner and colleagues [34] demonstrated AR documentation for car door assembly. Separate work by Tang and colleagues [42] and Robertson, MacIntyre and Walker [36], both addressing toy block assembly, demonstrated quantitative performance advantages for AR over traditional media and non-registered overlaid graphics. Zauner, Haller, and Brandl [47] presented, but did not evaluate, step-by-step AR instructions to help in assembly of furniture, while Salonen and Sääski [38] found that users gave high qualitative ratings to their AR system for 3D puzzle assembly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reiner and colleagues [34] demonstrated AR documentation for car door assembly. Separate work by Tang and colleagues [42] and Robertson, MacIntyre and Walker [36], both addressing toy block assembly, demonstrated quantitative performance advantages for AR over traditional media and non-registered overlaid graphics. Zauner, Haller, and Brandl [47] presented, but did not evaluate, step-by-step AR instructions to help in assembly of furniture, while Salonen and Sääski [38] found that users gave high qualitative ratings to their AR system for 3D puzzle assembly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that AR can improve the performance of the user in traditional industrial tasks like assembly work (Tang et al, 2003) and maintenance (Henderson and Feiner, 2009). We believe that the technology could also improve productivity in the field of forestry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, [28] described a comparative study of the effectiveness of four different presentations of instructions for an assembly task: printed manual, monitordisplay, see-through head-mounted display, and spatially registered augmented reality (AR). Measurements were task performance (time and accuracy) and perceived mental workload.…”
Section: Evidence Of the Importance Of Presentation Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%