2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative economic, environmental and productivity assessment of a concrete bathroom unit fabricated through 3D printing and a precast approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From a case study, Agusti-Juan and Habert [193] reported that, compared to conventional concreting, digital fabrication provides environmental benefits when applied for complex structures rather than simple geometrical shapes like wall structures. Weng et al [194] carried out a life cycle analysis and showed that 3DCP enables a reduction of about 86% CO 2 emission and about 87% energy consumption compared to a precast counterpart. A similar study indicated that the relative sustainability of the project depends primarily on the environmental and economic impact created by the production of the constituents of concrete.…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a case study, Agusti-Juan and Habert [193] reported that, compared to conventional concreting, digital fabrication provides environmental benefits when applied for complex structures rather than simple geometrical shapes like wall structures. Weng et al [194] carried out a life cycle analysis and showed that 3DCP enables a reduction of about 86% CO 2 emission and about 87% energy consumption compared to a precast counterpart. A similar study indicated that the relative sustainability of the project depends primarily on the environmental and economic impact created by the production of the constituents of concrete.…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there could be significant economic benefits, as there is no formwork. Weng et al [194] reported that the 3DCP could reduce the overall construction cost of construction by 25% when compared to precast structures primarily due to the absence of formwork. Fig.…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For economic and environmental impact assessments, the sum of material costs was obtained and life cycle CO 2 analysis of concrete (C35_O100, C24_G20, and C24_E50_G20) was conducted. The following two assumptions were established to obtain the results: (i) the analysis approach; and (ii) the significant cost of ownership [47,[52][53][54].…”
Section: Assessment Of Economic and Environmental Impacts On Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction and manufacturing processes are being optimized in the use of raw materials and energy efficiency. 2,3 Learning from industrial processes, heading towards Industry 4.0, threedimensional (3D) printing technology for construction is an option that can enhance efficiency planning and manufacturing. [3][4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1983, 7 3D printing technology has grown in most diverse industrial sectors: medicine, 8 art and design, 9 automotive industry 10 and, more recently, in construction industry. [11][12][13] Its use has allowed industry: to reduce material waste and energy consumption, 3,6,14 increase productivity, 3,6 and offer the ability to personalize products. 9,15,16 However, its implementation in construction presented new challenges than current industries: the printed element size is conditioned by the printer size 17 (the technology developed by the IAAC, "Minibuilders", arised from this problem, and achieved bigger prints than its own size 18 ); the material needs specific rheological properties, which makes it, in most cases, less sustainable and more expensive than traditional concrete; 13,19 technology does not yet have the quality levels of traditional construction processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%