1978
DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(78)90137-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative disposition of sulindac and metabolites in five species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sulindac is metabolized extensively by the liver in rats and humans, and plasma concentrations of sulindac metabolites are sustained because of extensive enterohepatic recycling (Dujovne et al, 1983). After intravenous administration of sulindac (10 mg/kg) in rats, the plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for S-sulfone was ϳ2.5-fold higher than that of sulindac, whereas the AUC for S-sulfide was only ϳ40% of that for sulindac (Duggan et al, 1978); Cl biliary of sulindac and S-sulfone were comparable, whereas S-sulfide Cl biliary was only 40% of that for sulindac. In humans, after oral administration of sulindac, peak plasma total concentrations (C max ) for sulindac, S-sulfone, and Ssulfide were 10 to 34, 4 to 19, and 3 to 33 M, respectively (Davies and Morris, 1993); the apparent Cl biliary of sulindac and S-sulfone, measured by an occludable T-tube that was placed in the common bile duct of patients after elective gallbladder surgery, was ϳ25-and ϳ18-fold greater, respectively, than that of S-sulfide .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sulindac is metabolized extensively by the liver in rats and humans, and plasma concentrations of sulindac metabolites are sustained because of extensive enterohepatic recycling (Dujovne et al, 1983). After intravenous administration of sulindac (10 mg/kg) in rats, the plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for S-sulfone was ϳ2.5-fold higher than that of sulindac, whereas the AUC for S-sulfide was only ϳ40% of that for sulindac (Duggan et al, 1978); Cl biliary of sulindac and S-sulfone were comparable, whereas S-sulfide Cl biliary was only 40% of that for sulindac. In humans, after oral administration of sulindac, peak plasma total concentrations (C max ) for sulindac, S-sulfone, and Ssulfide were 10 to 34, 4 to 19, and 3 to 33 M, respectively (Davies and Morris, 1993); the apparent Cl biliary of sulindac and S-sulfone, measured by an occludable T-tube that was placed in the common bile duct of patients after elective gallbladder surgery, was ϳ25-and ϳ18-fold greater, respectively, than that of S-sulfide .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, after oral administration of sulindac, peak plasma total concentrations (C max ) for sulindac, S-sulfone, and Ssulfide were 10 to 34, 4 to 19, and 3 to 33 M, respectively (Davies and Morris, 1993); the apparent Cl biliary of sulindac and S-sulfone, measured by an occludable T-tube that was placed in the common bile duct of patients after elective gallbladder surgery, was ϳ25-and ϳ18-fold greater, respectively, than that of S-sulfide . Several groups have reported a proportional relationship between S-sulfide concentrations and the incidence of hepatotoxicity, emphasizing the potential for metabolites, in addition to the parent drug, to cause hepatotoxicity (Duggan et al, 1978;Laffi et al, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also metabolized irreversibly to an inactive sulfone (18,19). In vitro anti -inflammatory test systems considered relevant to in vivo efficacy and correlations between drug concentration and biological effect ex vivo suggest that sulindac is a prodrug.…”
Section: Reversible and Irreversible Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a sulfoxide compound, ruc-ML-1035 sulfoxide may also undergo substantial metabolic interconversion with its sulfide metabolite, as those have been reported for sulfinpyraand sulindac. 20, 21 Therefore, the enantiomeric outcome after a prochiral sulfide dose is also of importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%