1969
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb56186.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Data and Requirements for Determination of Particle Size Distribution in Australian Pharmaceuticals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The container to container variation in counts of particles greater than 100 pm was narrower than the distribution typically found in containers of large volume parenterals (Kendall 1969). The samples tested, with one exception, would have complied with the limit x + 2s < 200; x < 150 where x is the mean count (ten containers) of particles greater than 100 pm and s is the standard deviation.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The container to container variation in counts of particles greater than 100 pm was narrower than the distribution typically found in containers of large volume parenterals (Kendall 1969). The samples tested, with one exception, would have complied with the limit x + 2s < 200; x < 150 where x is the mean count (ten containers) of particles greater than 100 pm and s is the standard deviation.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The approach adopted at National Biological Standards Laboratory (NBSL) has been to consider the mean and standard deviation of the results from ten individual containers, and has been discussed by Kendall (1969). The limit at present in use for particles which have effective diameters greater than 5 Fm is that the mean particle count is not more than 100 particles m1-l and that the sum of the mean and twice the standard deviation is not more than 200…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NBSL specification attempts to take into account the appreciable variation in particulate contamination which frequently occurs in samples of LVP's. The results of testing this type of product at NBSL indicate that the standard deviation for a sample of ten containers is commonly of the order of half the mean particle count (Kendall 1969). The pharmacopoeial requirements for content of particulate matter in LVP's give no indication of actual distribution of levels of contamination between containers and imply that all containers with particle counts above the specified limits are equally bad while all those passing the test are equally good.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%