1977
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600660212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Estimation of Particulate Matter in Pharmaceutical Preparations Intended for Intravenous Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this takes no account of shape or changes in resistivity between different particles [91]. This technique has been used extensively to count particles (1–1000 μm) in the pharmaceutical industry, especially to monitor the quality of intravenous solutions [92,93]. The technique is limited by the smallest available opening between the electrodes.…”
Section: Techniques To Analyse Insoluble Protein Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this takes no account of shape or changes in resistivity between different particles [91]. This technique has been used extensively to count particles (1–1000 μm) in the pharmaceutical industry, especially to monitor the quality of intravenous solutions [92,93]. The technique is limited by the smallest available opening between the electrodes.…”
Section: Techniques To Analyse Insoluble Protein Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…according to the authors, while only carbon black particles with sizes between 1 and 3 µm were identified in the 2G sample, carbon black, starch grains, lacquer flakes, and rubber with sizes up to 100 µm were found in the 2aL sample [2]. One product is within the specifications (2G) and the other is not (2aL).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Bikhazi et al [2] reported a logarithmic relationship between the number of particles and their diameter in a solution. Bikhazi et al [2] reported a logarithmic relationship between the number of particles and their diameter in a solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations