2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative chemical analysis of dew and rain water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During dew formation on the collection surface, cation (Ca 2+ /Mg 2+ ) rich particles could have entrapped within the droplet and therefore, the solubility of these ions from particles was more in dew whereas fog water-particle interactions take place in ambient air. Lekouch et al (2010) have reported higher pH of dew (avg = 6.7) in comparison to rain (avg = 6.4) due to variations in the atmospheric composition of aerosols and gas with altitude and time of exposure by raindrop and dew drop. In addition, pH depends on the dissolution of gases like CO 2 , SO 2 , NO 3 and particles during droplet growth, condensation volume and condensation time (Lekouch et al, 2010), the duration of time of exposure (Beysens et al, 2006) and pollutant concentrations in ambient atmosphere, wind dispersion, rainfall before fog and dew events (Ali et al, 2004).…”
Section: Ph and Conductivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During dew formation on the collection surface, cation (Ca 2+ /Mg 2+ ) rich particles could have entrapped within the droplet and therefore, the solubility of these ions from particles was more in dew whereas fog water-particle interactions take place in ambient air. Lekouch et al (2010) have reported higher pH of dew (avg = 6.7) in comparison to rain (avg = 6.4) due to variations in the atmospheric composition of aerosols and gas with altitude and time of exposure by raindrop and dew drop. In addition, pH depends on the dissolution of gases like CO 2 , SO 2 , NO 3 and particles during droplet growth, condensation volume and condensation time (Lekouch et al, 2010), the duration of time of exposure (Beysens et al, 2006) and pollutant concentrations in ambient atmosphere, wind dispersion, rainfall before fog and dew events (Ali et al, 2004).…”
Section: Ph and Conductivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, fog chemistry is influenced by number and composition of the particles, gaseous species (Herckes et al, 2007;Lekouch et al, 2011) as well as by the moisture content and temperature in ambient atmosphere. Dew water chemistry is also influenced by nature of surface on which it is formed (Beysens et al, 2006;Lekouch et al, 2010). Hence, fog and dew are good indicators to understand pollution sources and chemical interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were obtained, among others, by BEYSENS et al, (2006a) in Bordeaux. A few times higher EC values were reported during research studies conducted by JIRIES, (2001), MUSELLI et al, (2006a), POLKOWSKA et al (2008) and LEKOUCH et al (2010b in Jordan, France, Poland and Croatia, respectively. LEKOUCH et al (2010a) indicated the average EC value as high as 725 lS/cm determined during the scientific survey performed in Morocco.…”
Section: Conductivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Similar proposals in the theoretical considerations were presented by NILSSON, (1996) using a function of air temperature. The conducted measurements indicate that the greatest efficiency of dew formation (about 0.6 L/m 2 ) during a single dew episode was observed in the subtropical and semi-arid tropical zones in Israel, Croatia and India (BERKOWICZ et al, 2007;MUSELLI et al, 2009;LEKOUCH et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation