2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative characterization of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis from goats in Kerala, India and reference strain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the susceptibility tests confirm that the reference strains of C. pseudotuberculosis are sensitive to conventional antibiotics ( 23 , 31 , 32 ). Some studies show that different species of Corynebacterium may be resistant to antibiotics as a consequence of the presence of genes located on plasmids that confer resistance to streptomycin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline ( 33 35 ) and also to a resistance profile related to the activity beta-lactamases ( 36 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The results of the susceptibility tests confirm that the reference strains of C. pseudotuberculosis are sensitive to conventional antibiotics ( 23 , 31 , 32 ). Some studies show that different species of Corynebacterium may be resistant to antibiotics as a consequence of the presence of genes located on plasmids that confer resistance to streptomycin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline ( 33 35 ) and also to a resistance profile related to the activity beta-lactamases ( 36 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…[34], and Mohan et al . [35]. Table-1 indicates that vancomycin (100%), ciprofloxacin (100%), amikacin (100%), neomycin (100%), gentamicin (100%), streptomycin (100%), novobiocin (100%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (96%), rifampicin (86%), penicillin G (65%), and TE (78%) were sensitive to Staphylococcus isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the disease can be diagnosed through microbiological culture of caseous material, most infected animals may develop internal granulomas, commonly in the lungs or mediastinal lymph nodes, not expressing clinical signs of infection (BINNS et al, 2007;LIMA et al, 2017). Once established in the herd, the eradication of this disease is a difficult step, due to the difficulty in treatment and the detection of animals contaminated by clinical signs has its efficiency limited (MOHAN et al, 2008;PAULE et al, 2004;SÁ et al, 2021). Given this complexity, new biotechnological approaches have been used by researchers to unravel the molecular mechanisms of virulence of C. pseudotuberculosis, aiming to mimic in vitro the in vivo conditions in which the agent installs itself and develops the infectious picture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%