1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00179755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative biology and management of Arctic and European grayling (Salmonidae, Thymallus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
175
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
175
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, whitefish seemed to have a restricted trophic niche, likely resulting from competitive interactions with the other two fish species. Grayling usually forage on surface insects and benthic invertebrates along the shallow lake shores (Northcote 1995), but in sympatry with brown trout, they may shift foraging habitat to deeper areas (Haugen & Rygg 1996). In our study lakes, there were no clear signs of competitive constraints on grayling as they appeared to utilise their principal littoral niche.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, whitefish seemed to have a restricted trophic niche, likely resulting from competitive interactions with the other two fish species. Grayling usually forage on surface insects and benthic invertebrates along the shallow lake shores (Northcote 1995), but in sympatry with brown trout, they may shift foraging habitat to deeper areas (Haugen & Rygg 1996). In our study lakes, there were no clear signs of competitive constraints on grayling as they appeared to utilise their principal littoral niche.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In some subarctic lakes, Arctic charr and whitefish coexist together with European grayling (Thymallus thymallus). All three species have a generalist feeding behaviour, but in allopatry usually prefer the littoral feeding habitat because of the higher availability of large-sized benthic prey Northcote 1995;Amundsen et al 2004). However, in sympatry, these fish species likely alter their foraging behaviour to diminish niche overlap, which otherwise could lead to competitive exclusion of the inferior species (Hardin 1960;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could result in low long-term effective population sizes and, consequently, depauperate levels of within-population T. thymallus microsatellite diversity. Mark-recapture and radio-telemetry studies support this hypothesis, as they have revealed grayling to be far less mobile than autumn spawning salmonids (Peterson, 1968;Northcote, 1995). Limited dispersal of grayling was also suggested by a recent microgeographic study within Lake Saimaa, eastern Finland, where microsatellite-based individual assignment tests were applied to investigate the genetic distinctiveness of three populations .…”
Section: Low Levels Of Genetic Diversity In T Thymallus Populations mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Heredity (2002) 88, 391-401. DOI: 10.1038/sj/hdy/6800072 populations complete their entire life cycle in rivers or lakes (reviewed in Northcote, 1995), some grayling are adapted to a brackish environment and inhabit parts of the Baltic Sea (Nykänen and Huusko, 1999), and some limited anadromy has been reported (Mü ller and Karlsson, 1983). Although less important for commercial fisheries than many other salmonids, T. thymallus is considered culturally important as a target for sport fisheries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European grayling has always been a common species throughout Eurasia (Northcote, 1995), but many local populations are currently endangered due to human modifications of river and lake systems (Koskinen, Piironen, & Primmer, 2001). Among important impacts are habitat loss and reduced connectivity between the remaining habitats (Heggenes et al, 2006;Junge, Museth, Hindar, Kraabøl, & Vøllestad, 2014;Van Leeuwen, Museth, Sandlund, Qvenild, & Vøllestad, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%