2018
DOI: 10.1002/ep.12853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of the fluoride removal capability of immobilized and dead cells of Staphylococcus lentus (KX941098) isolated from contaminated groundwater

Abstract: A microbial treatment of fluorinated aqueous solution was performed by using a novel bacterial strain isolated from fluoride‐loaded groundwater. Defluoridation efficiencies of two forms viz. immobilized live cells and dead biomass of the isolate were investigated by means of a series of batch studies. Initial fluoride concentration (1–25 mg L−1), pH (5–9), bead numbers (5–30), agitation speed (100–240 rpm), and temperature (20–45°C) were the various parameters studied to investigate the influence of each of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies shown that various F− resistant bacterial species isolated from various environment regimens [33,34,[45][46][47][48]. In this study, Pseudomonas was recognized as F− resistant bacteria confirmed by genus, species-specific PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing analysis.…”
Section: Selection Of Potent Strainssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Earlier studies shown that various F− resistant bacterial species isolated from various environment regimens [33,34,[45][46][47][48]. In this study, Pseudomonas was recognized as F− resistant bacteria confirmed by genus, species-specific PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing analysis.…”
Section: Selection Of Potent Strainssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Dead biomass is preferable over live microbes because it requires less care and nutrients. 411 Although Mukherjee et al 410 employed live Nostoc sp. (BTA934) microalgae to remove fluoride, defluoridation by utilizing live microalgal species is uncommon.…”
Section: Fluoride Mitigation Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…has been observed. Dead biomass is preferable over live microbes because it requires less care and nutrients 411. Although Mukherjee et al410 employed live Nostoc sp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bacterial-based bioremediation, maintaining high bacterial biomass for enhancing adsorption and survival of bacterial species in fluoride water is the most significant factor to be considered. This can be achieved by immobilizing bacterial cells [228,229]. In the experiment, bacterial cells were immobilized on different media, and more than 90% efficiencies were obtained [229,230].…”
Section: Bacterial Remediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by immobilizing bacterial cells [228,229]. In the experiment, bacterial cells were immobilized on different media, and more than 90% efficiencies were obtained [229,230]. This process can be further advanced via understanding the interactions between immobilized cells and fluoride ions at a molecular level, which can help to develop advanced genetically modified organisms.…”
Section: Bacterial Remediationmentioning
confidence: 99%