Comparative Assessment of Methods for Estimating Tumor Volume and Standardized Uptake Value in ¹⁸F-FDG PET

Abstract

In 18 F-FDG PET, tumors are often characterized by their metabolically active volume and standardized uptake value (SUV). However, many approaches have been proposed to estimate tumor volume and SUV from 18 F-FDG PET images, none of them being widely agreed upon. We assessed the accuracy and robustness of 5 methods for tumor volume estimates and of 10 methods for SUV estimates in a large variety of configurations. Methods: PET acquisitions of an anthropomorphic phantom containing 17 spheres (volumes between 0.43 and 97 mL, sphere-to-surrounding-activity concentration ratios between 2 and 68) were used. Forty-one nonspheric tumors (volumes between 0.6 and 92 mL, SUV of 2, 4, and 8) were also simulated and inserted in a real patient 18 F-FDG PET scan. Four threshold-based methods (including one, T bgd , accounting for background activity) and a model-based method (Fit) described in the literature were used for tumor volume measurements. The mean SUV in the resulting volumes were calculated, without and with partial-volume effect (PVE) correction, as well as the maximum SUV (SUV max ). The parameters involved in the tumor segmentation and SUV estimation methods were optimized using 3 approaches, corresponding to getting the best of each method or testing each method in more realistic situations in which the parameters cannot be perfectly optimized. Results: In the phantom and simulated data, the T bgd and Fit methods yielded the most accurate volume estimates, with mean errors of 2% 6 11% and 28% 6 21% in the most realistic situations. Considering the simulated data, all SUV not corrected for PVE had a mean bias between 231% and 246%, much larger than the bias observed with SUV max (211% 6 23%) or with the PVE-corrected SUV based on T bgd and Fit (22% 6 10% and 3% 6 24%). Conclusion: The method used to estimate tumor volume and SUV greatly affects the reliability of the estimates. The T bgd and Fit methods yielded low errors in volume estimates in a broad range of situations. The PVE-corrected SUV based on T bgd and Fit were more accurate and reproducible than SUV max .

A Graph-Based Method for PET Image Segmentation in Radiotherapy Planning: A Pilot Study

“…This was evident for the smaller spheres despite a drop in the RWg precision for lesions with diameter < 1cm and at low contrast. This was compatible with the severe errors in the volume estimation reported for small tumor volume [12]. Partial volume effect is one of the most important factors impacting the quality and the quantitative accuracy in PET imaging [13].…”

Hybrid positron emission tomography segmentation of heterogeneous lung tumors using 3D Slicer: improved GrowCut algorithm with threshold initialization

“…Intuitively, since FDG PET images show substantial contrast in glucose utilization between normal tissue and neoplastic tissue, threshold-based segmentation is one of the easier methods to adopt and implement. 20,28,[30][31][32] However, most threshold methods (T 25 and T 40 ) fail to identify a single threshold that includes the entire tumor in the presence of pronounced heterogeneities. 7 To overcome this methodological shortcoming, we used the interactive GrowCut algorithm implemented in the 3D Slicer.…”

Nonlaxative PET/CT Colonography: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Pilot Performance in Patients at Higher Risk of Colonic Neoplasia

“…All the avid polyps in our study had an SUV of greater than 3.4, and although recent work has shown reasonable reproducibility of SUV measurements in gastrointestinal malignancy (29), it is debatable how clinically useful quantitative measurement of uptake will be given the relative small size of polyps and variability in background physiologic bowel activity. Indeed, evidence documenting the major influence of partial voluming in the SUV measurement of small lesions is emerging (30).…”