2015
DOI: 10.4271/2015-01-2229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Assessment of Frequency Dependent Joint Properties Using Direct and Inverse Identification Methods

Abstract: for the opportunity and guidance while working on this project. My fellow students of the Acoustics and Dynamics Laboratory were consistently willing to give useful feedback and advice. The undergraduate machine shop was more than helpful as I created laboratory experimental fixtures. Lastly, I would like to thank Professor Harper for being a member of my thesis defense committee. v Vita

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification methods that utilize computational and experimental modal analysis, including direct and inverse methods, are integrated into these applications. A common feature of these studies is that the resilient element is treated as a joint at a certain point, defined in the driving point [101]- [105] or the elastic centre [106], so that only a point dynamic stiffness matrix is applied to describe the dynamic properties.…”
Section: Modal-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification methods that utilize computational and experimental modal analysis, including direct and inverse methods, are integrated into these applications. A common feature of these studies is that the resilient element is treated as a joint at a certain point, defined in the driving point [101]- [105] or the elastic centre [106], so that only a point dynamic stiffness matrix is applied to describe the dynamic properties.…”
Section: Modal-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%