2015
DOI: 10.1515/rrlm-2015-0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of bone regeneration by histometry and a histological scoring system / Evaluarea comparativă a regenerării osoase utilizând histometria și un scor de vindecare histologică

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A certified histologist who was blinded to the group distribution performed the histological analysis using a histological bone-healing scale [ 26 ]. This scale provides a score for 17 histological parameters ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A certified histologist who was blinded to the group distribution performed the histological analysis using a histological bone-healing scale [ 26 ]. This scale provides a score for 17 histological parameters ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of bone regeneration was performed following a modification of the histological evaluation method from Lucaciu et al [ 31 ] adapted for our study. Histological examination of slices was accomplished on a Zeiss Axio Scope A.1 photomicroscope.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At four different periods (2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks) histological study were performed, where the percentage of osteoid (newly formed bone), proportion of woven to lamellar bone, and number of osteoblast and osteoclast cells were measured. The percentage of new bone formation was determined and converted to a percentage of total area of bone defect which is 8mm 2 in this study (Jang et al, 2008) (Wang et al, 2017) and intensity or numbers of osteoblast and osteoclast were measured according to the following scores: 0 absent 1 present at periphery 2 present at center 3 present at center and periphery (Lucaciu et al, 2015)…”
Section: Histologic Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%