2002
DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2002.121425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy volunteers: The importance of dosing

Abstract: These results show that the differences in angiotensin II receptor blockade observed with the various AT(1) antagonists are explained mainly by differences in dosing. When 160-mg or 320-mg doses were investigated, the effects of valsartan hardly differed from those obtained with recommended doses of irbesartan and candesartan.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(29 reference statements)
6
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various factors, including dose level, receptor binding and pharmacokinetic parameters, affect the capacity of ARBs to block the AT 1 receptor and ARBs have been shown to differ in these areas. 8,10,13 This is demonstrated by a recent study of the effects of several ARBs on the pressor response to exogenously administered angiotensin II. The increase in BP produced by angiotensin II administration was almost completely blocked by both OM 20 mg and irbesartan 300 mg, but only partially blocked by valsartan 160 mg and losartan 100 mg. 13 Importantly, the addition of HCTZ to either OM 20 mg or irbesartan 300 mg had no significant effect on their ability to antagonize the activity of the AT 1 receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various factors, including dose level, receptor binding and pharmacokinetic parameters, affect the capacity of ARBs to block the AT 1 receptor and ARBs have been shown to differ in these areas. 8,10,13 This is demonstrated by a recent study of the effects of several ARBs on the pressor response to exogenously administered angiotensin II. The increase in BP produced by angiotensin II administration was almost completely blocked by both OM 20 mg and irbesartan 300 mg, but only partially blocked by valsartan 160 mg and losartan 100 mg. 13 Importantly, the addition of HCTZ to either OM 20 mg or irbesartan 300 mg had no significant effect on their ability to antagonize the activity of the AT 1 receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7 However, differences in angiotensin II (AT 1 ) receptor blockade observed with the various ARBs have been explained mainly by differences in dosing. 8 It can also be seen in the meta-analysis of Fabia et al that the ARB olmesartan medoxomil (OM) provides effective BP reductions over 24-h, which are maintained during the night-time and last few hours of the dosing interval. 7 Pharmacodynamic studies support this notion 9,10 and treating patients with the high (40 mg) dose of olmesartan should provide a high level of AT 1 -receptor blockade leading to increased BP reductions and control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma and urinary aldosterone concentrations more effective RAS inhibition than double the dose of the AT1 receptor antagonist (160 mg) or renin inhibitor (300 mg) alone. The question of the influence of dose selection and dosing interval remains critical for all RAS inhibitors and their effects on BP and end-organ protection (21)(22)(23). The additive or synergistic effects of such combinations are more evident at low doses (which are the usual dose) than at high doses (22).…”
Section: Combined Blockade Of the Ras By Aliskiren And Valsartanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the clinically used ARBs can differ with respect to pharmacokinetic characteristics such as half life, potency for AT 1 receptor blockade, degree of insurmountable antagonism, etc, one can usually minimize the practical impact of these differences on control of RAS activity and antihypertensive efficacy by making dose adjustments. 8 Thus, if one simply administers the appropriate doses required to control blood pressure and effectively inhibit the renin-angiotensin system, it is generally assumed that all ARBs will yield equally satisfactory protection against risk for cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: Current Limitations and Unmetmentioning
confidence: 99%