Comparative analysis of visual outcome with 3 intraocular lenses: monofocal, enhanced monofocal, and extended depth of focus

Corbelli, Eleonora; Iuliano, Lorenzo; Bandello, Francesco; Fasce, Francesco

doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000706

Cited by 38 publications

(105 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our study, relatively good UIVA and DCIVA were obtained with both IOLs. Previous studies have compared the Tecnis Eyhance IOL with other EDoF IOLs, such as Tecnis Symphony, a diffractive EDoF IOL 11–13 ; however, no study has evaluated the AcrySof IQ Vivity IOL to other EDoF IOLs. Lee et al 11 and Jeon et al 12 reported comparable monocular and binocular DCIVA with Tecnis Symphony and Tecnis Eyhance IOLs, respectively, whereas Corbelli et al 13 reported better monocular and binocular DCIVA with Tecnis Symphony.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study compared the AcrySof IQ Vivity, a nondiffractive EDoF IOL, with Tecnis Eyhance ICB00, which has been categorized as an enhanced monofocal IOL by some authors. [11][12][13] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the two IOLs based on their visual outcomes. In terms of refractive outcomes, both IOLs demonstrated excellent results consistent with the targeted refraction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Visual outcomes of non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A case-control study

Sabur

Ünsal

2022

European Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To compare the visual outcomes of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lens (IOL) with an enhanced monofocal IOL. Methods We evaluated 76 eyes from 38 patients who had undergone bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of either an EDoF IOL (AcrySof IQ Vivity, n = 40 eyes) or an enhanced monofocal IOL (Tecnis Eyhance, n = 36 eyes). Objective refraction, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, DCIVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuity (UNVA, DCNVA), binocular defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, halo and glare perception, and spectacle independence were compared. Results Monocular and binocular UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, and DCIVA were comparable in both groups, whereas UNVA and DCNVA were significantly better with the Vivity group than with the Eyhance group. The two groups had no statistically significant difference regarding photopic and scotopic contrast sensitivities or halo and glare perception. Compared to the Eyhance IOL, the Vivity IOL had a larger landing zone in the defocus curve and provided higher spectacle independence for near vision. Conclusion Both the AcrySof IQ Vivity and Tecnis Eyhance IOLs had excellent distant and intermediate visual acuity, while the former had more satisfactory near vision outcomes with greater spectacle independence rate. No differences were obtained between two IOLs in terms of patient satisfaction and visual disturbances such as halo and glare.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual outcomes of non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A case-control study

Sabur

Ünsal

2022

European Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For studies comparing multiple IOLs, stacked bar charts could replace the previous ones for reducing the number of figures and enable comparison. 16,17…”

Section: Efficacymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For studies comparing multiple IOLs, stacked bar charts could replace the previous ones for reducing the number of figures and enable comparison. 16,17 Researchers should avoid using nonstandardized charts or scales (Jaeger) at intermediate and near distances, and instead, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and logMAR should be used. 18 If another test is used, a previous validation with the ETDRS should be conducted.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Standard for collecting and reporting outcomes of IOL–based refractive surgery: update for enhanced monofocal, EDOF, and multifocal IOLs

Fernández

Ribeiro²,

Rodríguez‐Vallejo³

et al. 2022

J Cataract Refract Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A recent study conducted by Corbelli et al 29 compared the performance of the Eyhance IOL to that of the monofocal ZCB00 and EDOF IOLs (Tecnis Symfony ZXR00). The findings showed that the Eyhance IOLs achieved comparable intermediate vision to that achieved by the EDOF IOL 30 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ presented by the Eyhance IOL, we aimed to provide additional insight by applying the mini-monovision technique to improve near vision.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction of pseudophakic mini-monovision using a new monofocal intraocular lens

Park

Ahn

Han

et al. 2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modified monovision—or “mini-monovision”—is an alternative method to multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) for treating presbyopia. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the new enhanced monofocal Tecnis Eyhance (ICB00) IOLs with the mini-monovision technique to improve near vision. In this retrospective case series, the medical records of 50 patients (100 eyes) who underwent bilateral cataract surgery were reviewed. Patients were divided into the Emmetropia and Mini-monovision groups based on the postoperative spherical equivalent and residual myopia. The binocular visual acuity for far (4 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) distances, binocular defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, visual symptoms, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction rates were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. The binocular uncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, incidence of photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the binocular uncorrected near visual acuities and spectacle independence rates were significantly better in the Mini-monovision group (p < 0.001). Conclusively, the pseudophakic mini-monovision technique using enhanced monofocal IOLs may be a promising option for presbyopia correction in patients unsuitable for multifocal IOLs.

show abstract

Comparative analysis of visual outcome with 3 intraocular lenses: monofocal, enhanced monofocal, and extended depth of focus

Abstract: The Eyhance ICB00 IOL provides visual outcome and spectacle independence for intermediate distance comparable with enhanced depth-of-focus Symfony ZXR00, while retaining a subjective optical quality equivalent to the monofocal ZCB00.

Cited by 38 publications

References 29 publications

Visual outcomes of non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A case-control study

Visual outcomes of non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A case-control study

Standard for collecting and reporting outcomes of IOL–based refractive surgery: update for enhanced monofocal, EDOF, and multifocal IOLs

Visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction of pseudophakic mini-monovision using a new monofocal intraocular lens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About