No abstract

Objective To compare the visual outcomes of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lens (IOL) with an enhanced monofocal IOL. Methods We evaluated 76 eyes from 38 patients who had undergone bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of either an EDoF IOL (AcrySof IQ Vivity, n = 40 eyes) or an enhanced monofocal IOL (Tecnis Eyhance, n = 36 eyes). Objective refraction, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, DCIVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuity (UNVA, DCNVA), binocular defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, halo and glare perception, and spectacle independence were compared. Results Monocular and binocular UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, and DCIVA were comparable in both groups, whereas UNVA and DCNVA were significantly better with the Vivity group than with the Eyhance group. The two groups had no statistically significant difference regarding photopic and scotopic contrast sensitivities or halo and glare perception. Compared to the Eyhance IOL, the Vivity IOL had a larger landing zone in the defocus curve and provided higher spectacle independence for near vision. Conclusion Both the AcrySof IQ Vivity and Tecnis Eyhance IOLs had excellent distant and intermediate visual acuity, while the former had more satisfactory near vision outcomes with greater spectacle independence rate. No differences were obtained between two IOLs in terms of patient satisfaction and visual disturbances such as halo and glare.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens can be safely implanted without the use of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices. This retrospective study comprised 100 eyes having phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation without the use of ophthalmic viscosurgical device. 80 eyes with the use of a viscosurgical device are used as control group. In this intraocular lens implantation technique, the anterior chamber was maintained with an irrigation cannula and intraocular lens was implanted with a lens injector. Visual acuity, corneal clarity and edema, intraocular pressure, and corneal endothelial cell count were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at days 1, 7, and 30. Corneal endothelial cell count was repeated 2 weeks after surgery. Complications of this technique were also evaluated. No significant complications of this intraocular lens implantation technique, such as posterior capsule rupture, intraocular lens buttonholing, zonular dialysis, Descemet's tear/detachment, occurred. On the seventh postoperative day, 90 % of eyes achieved 20/20 or better vision. There was no difference in corneal endothelial cell loss between viscoelastic device-used and not-used cases (p = 0.356). When implanting intraocular lens without the use of ophthalmic viscosurgical device, significant intraoperative complications did not occur. The possible advantages are shortened surgery time, avoidance of postoperative IOP spike from ocular viscosurgical device (OVD) remnant, and reduced cost.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the new Intrepid Hybrid tip and Active Sentry handpiece in comparison to the Intrepid Balanced tip and Centurion Ozil handpiece. Methods One hundred sixty-eight eyes were included in the study and randomized into Group 1 (Active Sentry handpiece + Intrepid Hybrid tip, n = 86) and Group 2 (Centurion Ozil handpiece + Intrepid Balanced tip, n = 82). Data were collected from the phaco device, including total U/S time, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), the total number of active surge mitigation actuations (ASM actuations), torsional amplitude, torsional amplitude on time, estimated fluid of aspirated, and aspiration time. Endothelial cell count (ECC) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were assessed. A correlation analysis was performed between ASM actuations, phaco metrics, and patient characteristics in Group 1. Results The CDE, torsional amplitude measured in Group 1 (8.8 ± 3.9, 51.2 ± 13.3, respectively) were significantly lower than those of Group 2 (10.4 ± 4.2, 65.2 ± 9.3, respectively). While no complications were observed in group 1, there were posterior capsule rupture in 2 eyes and iris damage in 1 eye in group 2. The mean ECC and CCT were similar at 1 month. The ASM actuations were more engaged in the eyes with pseudoexfoliation and small pupils. Conclusion The combination of the new Intrepid Hybrid tip and Active Sentry handpiece enables safer cataract procedures without compromising efficacy due to its surge prevention mechanisms and special tip design. It could be a good option for residents in training.

Biocompatibility and reduced rate of PCO development are among the leading features of new generation IOLs. The intracapsular implantation of 5.5 mm optics acrylic IOLs resulted in decreased incidence of PCO and therefore greater patient satisfaction. Further studies investigating the effects of IOL optics, haptic structure and length, capsulorrhexis size, and IOL material and design features on PCO development will clarify the subject. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2004; 14: #-80).