2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of virulence determinants, phylogroups, and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of typical versus atypical Enteroaggregative E. coli in India

Abstract: Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) is an evolving enteric pathogen that causes acute and chronic diarrhea in developed and industrialized nations in children. EAEC epidemiology and the importance of atypical EAEC (aEAEC) isolation in childhood diarrhea are not well documented in the Indian setting. A comparative analysis was undertaken to evaluate virulence, phylogeny, and antibiotic sensitivity among typical tEAEC versus aEAEC. A total of 171 EAEC isolates were extracted from a broad surveillance sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All strains in lineage 1 were O166:H15 and belonged to ST349, lineage 2 consisted of serogroups O44, O73, and O17/O77 in combination with either H18 or H34 and ST130, while lineage 3 carried O153:H30 serotype and ST38 [146]. Contrarily, in India, EAEC strains implicated in diarrhea were more prevalent in phylogroup D [158] suggesting that the diversity in the pathotype is not limited by geography. While EAEC subtypes are believed to differ in their virulence determinants content, this hypothesis and comparative phylogenetic analysis of aEAEC and tEAEC are underexplored.…”
Section: Population Structure Of Eaecmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All strains in lineage 1 were O166:H15 and belonged to ST349, lineage 2 consisted of serogroups O44, O73, and O17/O77 in combination with either H18 or H34 and ST130, while lineage 3 carried O153:H30 serotype and ST38 [146]. Contrarily, in India, EAEC strains implicated in diarrhea were more prevalent in phylogroup D [158] suggesting that the diversity in the pathotype is not limited by geography. While EAEC subtypes are believed to differ in their virulence determinants content, this hypothesis and comparative phylogenetic analysis of aEAEC and tEAEC are underexplored.…”
Section: Population Structure Of Eaecmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nearly 40 % of diarrhoeal episodes among children <5 years of age are caused by members of the DEC pathotype in low-to middle-income countries [25]. On the basis of their specific virulence determinant, phenotypic traits and clinical symptoms, DEC strains are classified into six major pathotypes, this includes enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), and diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC) [22,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) is one of the six diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes ( Harrington et al., 2006 ; Estrada-Garcia and Navarro-Garcia, 2012 ; Modgil et al., 2020 ). EAEC strain’s defining phenotype is the aggregative adherence pattern on epithelial cells, attributable to the aggregative adherence fimbriae (AAF) ( Estrada-Garcia and Navarro-Garcia, 2012 ; Modgil et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) is one of the six diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes ( Harrington et al., 2006 ; Estrada-Garcia and Navarro-Garcia, 2012 ; Modgil et al., 2020 ). EAEC strain’s defining phenotype is the aggregative adherence pattern on epithelial cells, attributable to the aggregative adherence fimbriae (AAF) ( Estrada-Garcia and Navarro-Garcia, 2012 ; Modgil et al., 2020 ). The AggR regulon, which defines typical EAEC (tEAEC) strains, was first described in the archetype EAEC strain 042 (serotype O44:H18) isolated from a Peruvian child with diarrhea ( Czeczulin et al., 1997 ; Harrington et al., 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation