The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of the measurement methods for the supraharmonic range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, SH distortions caused by nonlinear loads increase power losses and thus have an adverse impact on the distribution systems and components of electric utilities. Finally, SH are known to cause instability in weak networks with inverters of MG systems, with the consequent spurious tripping of inverters [100][101][102]. Therefore, the effects of SH are hazardous if not taken seriously.…”
Section: A Consequences Of Supraharmonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, SH distortions caused by nonlinear loads increase power losses and thus have an adverse impact on the distribution systems and components of electric utilities. Finally, SH are known to cause instability in weak networks with inverters of MG systems, with the consequent spurious tripping of inverters [100][101][102]. Therefore, the effects of SH are hazardous if not taken seriously.…”
Section: A Consequences Of Supraharmonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some researchers studied the possible measurement and mitigation methods and devices for SH. The authors in [102] suggest that the signal sampling rate must be chosen as per the rules of signal analysis so that components up to 9 kHz can be measured. However, in transforming the data utilizing the FFT, the number of samples should be processed by a power of two; thus, the total sampling will be 20.48 kHz.…”
Section: Measurements and Mitigation Of Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the relevant standards specify only informative (non-normative) field measurement methods for assessment of grid compliance [6], [7], [8]. Comparisons between these measurement methods have been performed and published, discussing the differences in their characteristics, testing them with simple synthetic signals, or comparing their performance with recorded grid signals [9], [10], [11], [12]. However, in recent years many efforts have been put into developing alternative measurement methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent development of high-performance control systems determines emissions of spectral components that are beyond the classical 2 kHz milestone that individuates the low-frequency components, as they can reach up to 150 kHz for the common switching frequencies of the converters. The components in the range 2-150 kHz, typically labeled as supraharmonics in the relevant literature, have been studied much less than their low-frequency counterparts [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%