Comparative analysis of the dual EGFR-DNA targeting and growth inhibitory properties of 6-mono-alkylamino- and 6,6-dialkylaminoquinazoline-based type II combi-molecules
“…The DNA-based reactivity of JS230 was assessed in vitro using a direct chemical reaction with 2′-deoxyguanosine (dG) under physiological conditions according to a protocol by Haapala et al (see the Supporting Information, Figure S20). DNA damaging agents like busulfan and nitrogen mustards are known to react mainly with the N 7 position of guanine in DNA. , As depicted in Figure , hydrolytic product 4 was detected in the reaction mixture, as previously described . Although an aziridinium ion formation cannot be monitored, we surmise that compound 4 results from the hydrolysis of the latter intermediate I 1 –I 2 , as previously reported for nitrogen mustards .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…20,21 As depicted in Figure 3, hydrolytic product 4 was detected in the reaction mixture, as previously described. 22 Although an aziridinium ion formation cannot be monitored, we surmise that compound 4 results from the hydrolysis of the latter intermediate I 1 −I 2 , as previously reported for nitrogen mustards. 23 By contrast, the clinical alkylating drug busulfan is known to alkylate DNA through direct nucleophilic substitution (S N 2).…”
Resistance to chemotherapy in advanced cancers can be mediated by different factors such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression and DNA repair enzymes. Therefore, current standards of care usually involve combinations of multiple treatments. Here, to reduce the adverse effects of multiple drug combinations and improve outcome, we proposed a single drug approach to block multiple overlapping effects that characterize chemoresistance. Thus, we designed a new linker that allows assembly of multiple functions (e.g., inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation, induction of DNA lesions, and blockade of their repair) into a single molecule. This led to the successful synthesis of a novel and potent combi-molecule JS230. Here, we demonstrated that in resistant prostate cancer cells overexpressing EGFR, it was capable of (a) inhibiting EGFR in a dose-dependent manner, (b) damaging DNA, and (c) sustaining the damage by inhibiting the DNA repair protein poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). The triple mechanism of action of JS230 cumulated into growth inhibitory potency superior to that of classical two-or three-drug combinations.
“…The DNA-based reactivity of JS230 was assessed in vitro using a direct chemical reaction with 2′-deoxyguanosine (dG) under physiological conditions according to a protocol by Haapala et al (see the Supporting Information, Figure S20). DNA damaging agents like busulfan and nitrogen mustards are known to react mainly with the N 7 position of guanine in DNA. , As depicted in Figure , hydrolytic product 4 was detected in the reaction mixture, as previously described . Although an aziridinium ion formation cannot be monitored, we surmise that compound 4 results from the hydrolysis of the latter intermediate I 1 –I 2 , as previously reported for nitrogen mustards .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…20,21 As depicted in Figure 3, hydrolytic product 4 was detected in the reaction mixture, as previously described. 22 Although an aziridinium ion formation cannot be monitored, we surmise that compound 4 results from the hydrolysis of the latter intermediate I 1 −I 2 , as previously reported for nitrogen mustards. 23 By contrast, the clinical alkylating drug busulfan is known to alkylate DNA through direct nucleophilic substitution (S N 2).…”
Resistance to chemotherapy in advanced cancers can be mediated by different factors such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression and DNA repair enzymes. Therefore, current standards of care usually involve combinations of multiple treatments. Here, to reduce the adverse effects of multiple drug combinations and improve outcome, we proposed a single drug approach to block multiple overlapping effects that characterize chemoresistance. Thus, we designed a new linker that allows assembly of multiple functions (e.g., inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation, induction of DNA lesions, and blockade of their repair) into a single molecule. This led to the successful synthesis of a novel and potent combi-molecule JS230. Here, we demonstrated that in resistant prostate cancer cells overexpressing EGFR, it was capable of (a) inhibiting EGFR in a dose-dependent manner, (b) damaging DNA, and (c) sustaining the damage by inhibiting the DNA repair protein poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). The triple mechanism of action of JS230 cumulated into growth inhibitory potency superior to that of classical two-or three-drug combinations.
“…Halogenated bond formation is also observed by the 2-chlorine atom of the quinazoline 16c for both the interaction with EGFR and DNA, which could induce an additive or synergistic effect in antiproliferative activity. 52 Further, the interaction of 16a into VEGFR-2 receptor, presents the same tendency of hydrogen bond formation but in smaller number in comparison to 16c-DNA.…”
“…We demonstrated that this strategy culminated into strong levels of apoptosis in tumor cells [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. The studies on the designs of the combi-molecules led to their classification into two types: Type I combi-molecules [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ] require hydrolysis to generate DNA-alkylating species, whereas type II combi-molecules [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ] are chimeric systems capable of eliciting dual biological activity without a requirement for metabolic activation. In vitro, the most potent type II combi-molecules reported by our laboratory are mustard conjugates directly attached to the quinazoline ring [ 13 , 14 , 19 ].…”
Background: ZR2002 is a dual EGFR-DNA-targeting combi-molecule that carries a chloroethyl group at the six-position of the quinazoline ring designed to alkylate DNA. Despite its good pharmacokinetics, ZR2002 is metabolized in vivo into dechlorinated metabolites, losing the DNA-alkylating function required to damage DNA. To increase the DNA damage activity in tumor cells in vivo, we compared ZR2002 with two of its 6-N,N-disubstituted analogs: “JS61”, with a nitrogen mustard function at the six-position of the quinazoline ring, and “JS84”, with an N-methyl group. Methods: Tumor xenografts were performed with the human Saos-2 osteosarcoma cell line expressing EGFR. Mice were treated with ZR2002, JS84 or JS61, and the tumor burden was measured with a caliper and CT/PET imaging. Drug metabolism was analyzed with LC-MS. EGFR and ɣ-H2AX phosphorylation were quantified via Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. Results: In vivo analysis showed that significant tumor growth inhibition was only achieved when ZR2002 was administered in its naked form. The metabolic dealkylation of JS61 and JS84 did not release sufficient concentrations of ZR2002 for the intratumoral inhibition of P-EGFR or enhanced levels of P-H2AX. Conclusions: The results in toto suggest that intratumoral concentrations of intact ZR2002 are correlated with the highest inhibition of P-EGFR and induction of DNA damage in vivo. ZR2002 may well represent a good drug candidate for the treatment of EGFR-expressing osteosarcoma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.