2005
DOI: 10.1021/ie040253r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of the Carbon Dioxide Absorption and Recuperation Capacities in Aqueous 2-(2-Aminoethylamino)ethanol (AEE) and Blends of Aqueous AEE and N-Methyldiethanolamine Solutions

Abstract: A study of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) absorption/desorption has been carried out in diverse aqueous amine solutions consisting of 2-(2-aminoethylamino)ethanol (AEE), monoethanolamine (MEA), and the blends of AEE and N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) at different concentrations to compare the CO 2 loading and recuperation properties of these amines. The CO 2 absorption loading has been estimated in 0.476, 0.951, 1.427, and 2.378 M AEE solutions, a 2.378 M MEA solution, and two blends of 1.427 M AEE + 0.418 M MDEA and 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(97 reference statements)
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, and these data indicate that an increase in the amine concentration produces a decrease in the CO 2 loading. This behaviour is in agreement with previous studies using different amines as a reagent to capture acid gases [11][12][13]. This behaviour has been assigned to different causes in previous works: (i) an increase in the liquid phase viscosity due to an increase in the amine concentration, that produces a decrease in the diffusion coef- ficients, and (ii) aggregation processes between amine molecules when the concentration increases, being an inconvenient to the access of CO 2 molecules into the amino group in order to produce the reaction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…3, and these data indicate that an increase in the amine concentration produces a decrease in the CO 2 loading. This behaviour is in agreement with previous studies using different amines as a reagent to capture acid gases [11][12][13]. This behaviour has been assigned to different causes in previous works: (i) an increase in the liquid phase viscosity due to an increase in the amine concentration, that produces a decrease in the diffusion coef- ficients, and (ii) aggregation processes between amine molecules when the concentration increases, being an inconvenient to the access of CO 2 molecules into the amino group in order to produce the reaction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…2−5 Among them, aqueous 2-(2-aminoethylamine)ethanol (AEEA) solutions (5 to 25) wt % have a CO 2 capacity of (1.35 to 1.12) mol CO 2 /mol amine at 296 K and atmospheric pressure. 2,3 In the modern industry, the heat of regeneration for the stripping out of CO 2 from rich amine solutions in a regeneration process, which consists of sensible heat, reaction heat, latent heat of partial water, and partial latent heat of solvent vaporization, contributes (50 to 80) % of the total energy consumption in a chemical solvent based on the CO 2 separation process. 6 Many researchers have used blended amines, a solution of two or more amines in a variety of compositions, to improve absorption or desorption ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, aqueous alkanolamines have been largely exploited as efficient solvents to separate and recover CO 2 from steel and cement production plants, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel fired power plants, and in areas related to petroleum drilling and natural gas purification (Astarita et al, 1984;Bonenfant et al, 2005;Choi et al, 2007;Idem et al, 2006;Jassim and Rochelle, 2006;Oyenekan and Rochelle, 2006;Park et al, 2002;Yeh et al, 2001). In postcombustion capture methods, alkanolamines quickly react with low CO 2 content (5-10%) flue gas with high absorption efficiency and good loading capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%