2018 IEEE 18th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (PEMC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/epepemc.2018.8522010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Small-Signal Dynamics in Virtual Synchronous Machines and Frequency-Derivative-Based Inertia Emulation

Abstract:  Abstract-This paper presents a comparison of small-signal dynamics for a current controlled Virtual Synchronous Machine (VSM), a voltage controlled VSM and a df/dt-based control strategy for inertia emulation. The comparison is based on statespace models of the considered control schemes, which are linearized and utilized for eigenvalue-based analysis. Starting from a comparison of the three schemes with manually tuned controller parameters, it is shown that the current controlled VSM can be unstable for str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the realisation of GFM-VSG control can be classified as (1) GFM-VSG without inner loop control [9], (2) current-controlled GFM-VSG [10,11] and (3) voltagecontrolled GFM-VSG [12][13][14]. Configuration (3) with voltagecurrent double-loop control has been proven to maintain stable operation within a wide range of grid impedance [15]. This configuration also provides more flexibility in integrating potential functions such as current limiting and unbalance/ harmonics compensation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the realisation of GFM-VSG control can be classified as (1) GFM-VSG without inner loop control [9], (2) current-controlled GFM-VSG [10,11] and (3) voltagecontrolled GFM-VSG [12][13][14]. Configuration (3) with voltagecurrent double-loop control has been proven to maintain stable operation within a wide range of grid impedance [15]. This configuration also provides more flexibility in integrating potential functions such as current limiting and unbalance/ harmonics compensation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%