2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of real-time kinematic and PPP techniques in dynamic environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of this approach are that ZTD can be estimated in real time [41] and that GPS data are available under all weather conditions. Furthermore, recently data collected with smartphones GPS receivers have been processed using PPP [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of this approach are that ZTD can be estimated in real time [41] and that GPS data are available under all weather conditions. Furthermore, recently data collected with smartphones GPS receivers have been processed using PPP [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system is installed in coastal areas to measure vertical land motions and real-time kinematic (RTK) corrections. The RTK positioning given by a single GNSS receiver only outputs an accuracy from a few centimeters up to 0.1 m near a base station [ 24 ]. Actual coordinates within a localized reference frame are delivered via high-precision GNSS positioning [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reha Metin Alkan et al [5] evaluated the positioning performance of Trimble RTX RT-PPP through single baseline RTK real-time relative positioning and network RTK in Obruk Lake, Türkiye. The results show that although the network RTK method provides the best positioning performance, most of the time cannot be located due to the loss of cellular network connection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convergence time of the GPS-only postmission solution is about 15 minutes, and the positioning accuracy after convergence on the ENU directional component ranges from -10 cm to 6 cm, -2 cm to 9 cm, and -13 cm to 22 cm, respectively. This article uses the root mean square error (RMSE) as the positioning accuracy assessment index[5]. Equation (1) represents the root mean square of a twodimensional positioning error, and Equation (2) represents the root mean square of a three-dimensional positioning error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%