2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of motor unit action potentials of the medial gastrocnemius muscle in cats and rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the increase of amplitude was observed mainly for S MUs, we concluded that motor neurons of these MUs were the most active in reinnervation. The amplitude of MUAP correlates with MU force, and the MU forces increased only for S MUs in the ALS III group. At the same time, twitch forces as well as action potential amplitudes of FF MUs were lower in the ALS animals as compared with controls, also suggesting that the strongest FF MUs degenerated during disease development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Because the increase of amplitude was observed mainly for S MUs, we concluded that motor neurons of these MUs were the most active in reinnervation. The amplitude of MUAP correlates with MU force, and the MU forces increased only for S MUs in the ALS III group. At the same time, twitch forces as well as action potential amplitudes of FF MUs were lower in the ALS animals as compared with controls, also suggesting that the strongest FF MUs degenerated during disease development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The following MUAP parameters were measured: (1) amplitude (from the minimum to the maximum of an MUAP recording); (2) total duration (from the beginning to the end of an MUAP recording); (3) peak‐to‐peak time (between the minimum and maximum deflections of a MUAP recording); (4) number of turns (points of change in direction of a potential with at least 50‐µV difference); and (5) number of phases (number of isoelectric line crossings plus 1) (Fig. C) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is relative amplitude that exhibits the robust recruitment effect, which suggests that it is primarily influenced by factors intrinsic to the motor unit, such as the number of fibers it contains (Henneman and Mendell 1981) or the cross-sectional area of individual fibers (Goldberg and Derfler 1977). The precise effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in determining EMG spike amplitude have been extensively discussed and modeled (e.g., Akaboshi et al 2000; Clamann and Robinson 1985; Ertas et al 1995; Fuglevand et al 1993; Keenan and Valero-Cuevas 2007; Keenan et al 2006; Krutki et al 2008; Nandedkar et al 1988a,b; Stålberg and Karlsson 2001; Yao et al 2000). In general terms, it appears that intrinsic factors are likely to be particularly dominant in small muscles, especially if they contain only one type of muscle fiber, as appears to be the case for the retractor bulbi muscle (Alvarado et al 1967; Crandall et al 1981; Gurahian and Goldberg 1987; Lennerstrand 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%