2018
DOI: 10.6087/kcse.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of manuscript management systems for scholarly publishing

Abstract: To improve scholarly communications with scientists throughout the world, an international-level manuscript management system is indispensable. We analyzed the manuscript management systems currently in use in Korea and suggested ways to improve these domestic systems through benchmarking with representative overseas systems. Drawing information from the manufacturer's documentation, we compared the functionalities of the major manuscript management systems available in Korea to international systems. Based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim et al [81] compared nine manuscript management systems concerning authors, reviewers, and editors' viewpoints on various areas such as registration, authority control, file uploading, input keyword, input metadata, and review process communication. They suggested improvements in functionality and highlighted the need to simplify editorial tasks at multiple levels.…”
Section: Editorial Workflow and Publication Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al [81] compared nine manuscript management systems concerning authors, reviewers, and editors' viewpoints on various areas such as registration, authority control, file uploading, input keyword, input metadata, and review process communication. They suggested improvements in functionality and highlighted the need to simplify editorial tasks at multiple levels.…”
Section: Editorial Workflow and Publication Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even some journals under Elsevier publisher have their own system and it is somehow different from one to another. It is undeniably that keeping up with the journal management system is a complicated and time-consuming task that the authors may neglect some of the stages while submitting the paper [14]. In this phase, the editors who play a role as trainers offer the participants an opportunity of dealing with journal management systems.…”
Section: Extensive Phase Of Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparative analysis of manuscript management systems of the scholarly journals out of the Editorial Manager EVISE of Elsevier 6700 Journals and Clarivate Analytics 7000 journals system support by the ORCID ID (Kim et al, 2018). These two-manuscript portal system covered at least market share of 60% of the Journals.…”
Section: Reporting On the Impact Of Research And Tracking Compliance ...mentioning
confidence: 99%